Total babies named Boyd (all years): 27,670
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 65 / #2207 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 67 / #2148 / 0.004% |
| 2022 | 107 / #1628 / 0.006% |
| 2021 | 106 / #1605 / 0.006% |
| 2020 | 109 / #1527 / 0.006% |
| 2019 | 97 / #1659 / 0.005% |
| 2018 | 117 / #1479 / 0.006% |
| 2017 | 122 / #1422 / 0.007% |
| 2016 | 99 / #1619 / 0.005% |
| 2015 | 81 / #1828 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 99 / #1588 / 0.005% |
| 2013 | 75 / #1881 / 0.004% |
| 2012 | 73 / #1943 / 0.004% |
| 2011 | 44 / #2707 / 0.002% |
| 2010 | 49 / #2519 / 0.003% |
| 2009 | 43 / #2804 / 0.002% |
| 2008 | 51 / #2474 / 0.003% |
| 2007 | 63 / #2141 / 0.003% |
| 2006 | 38 / #2937 / 0.002% |
| 2005 | 43 / #2571 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 44 / #2495 / 0.002% |
| 2003 | 43 / #2435 / 0.002% |
| 2002 | 51 / #2094 / 0.003% |
| 2001 | 40 / #2432 / 0.002% |
| 2000 | 41 / #2336 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 41 / #2235 / 0.002% |
| 1998 | 45 / #2069 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 63 / #1601 / 0.003% |
| 1996 | 51 / #1785 / 0.003% |
| 1995 | 53 / #1683 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 58 / #1581 / 0.003% |
| 1993 | 55 / #1620 / 0.003% |
| 1992 | 57 / #1545 / 0.003% |
| 1991 | 57 / #1528 / 0.003% |
| 1990 | 64 / #1396 / 0.003% |
| 1989 | 50 / #1591 / 0.003% |
| 1988 | 54 / #1429 / 0.003% |
| 1987 | 54 / #1369 / 0.003% |
| 1986 | 67 / #1155 / 0.004% |
| 1985 | 79 / #1034 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 76 / #1024 / 0.004% |
| 1983 | 68 / #1079 / 0.004% |
| 1982 | 100 / #894 / 0.006% |
| 1981 | 96 / #914 / 0.005% |
| 1980 | 98 / #905 / 0.005% |
| 1979 | 102 / #858 / 0.006% |
| 1978 | 102 / #847 / 0.006% |
| 1977 | 115 / #796 / 0.007% |
| 1976 | 111 / #786 / 0.007% |
| 1975 | 137 / #707 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 151 / #655 / 0.010% |
| 1973 | 148 / #656 / 0.010% |
| 1972 | 154 / #639 / 0.010% |
| 1971 | 185 / #615 / 0.010% |
| 1970 | 273 / #490 / 0.015% |
| 1969 | 251 / #484 / 0.014% |
| 1968 | 271 / #462 / 0.016% |
| 1967 | 252 / #475 / 0.014% |
| 1966 | 265 / #469 / 0.015% |
| 1965 | 285 / #460 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 337 / #435 / 0.017% |
| 1963 | 339 / #433 / 0.017% |
| 1962 | 407 / #401 / 0.020% |
| 1961 | 356 / #421 / 0.017% |
| 1960 | 370 / #410 / 0.017% |
| 1959 | 378 / #408 / 0.018% |
| 1958 | 365 / #409 / 0.017% |
| 1957 | 387 / #391 / 0.018% |
| 1956 | 377 / #386 / 0.018% |
| 1955 | 370 / #376 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 343 / #385 / 0.017% |
| 1953 | 390 / #350 / 0.020% |
| 1952 | 397 / #345 / 0.020% |
| 1951 | 365 / #361 / 0.019% |
| 1950 | 342 / #365 / 0.019% |
| 1949 | 345 / #362 / 0.019% |
| 1948 | 354 / #358 / 0.020% |
| 1947 | 427 / #334 / 0.023% |
| 1946 | 362 / #340 / 0.022% |
| 1945 | 318 / #335 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 345 / #325 / 0.025% |
| 1943 | 405 / #307 / 0.028% |
| 1942 | 393 / #310 / 0.028% |
| 1941 | 412 / #285 / 0.034% |
| 1940 | 374 / #290 / 0.032% |
| 1939 | 361 / #290 / 0.033% |
| 1938 | 413 / #271 / 0.037% |
| 1937 | 419 / #264 / 0.039% |
| 1936 | 356 / #285 / 0.034% |
| 1935 | 351 / #289 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 398 / #272 / 0.039% |
| 1933 | 406 / #264 / 0.041% |
| 1932 | 397 / #274 / 0.038% |
| 1931 | 426 / #262 / 0.041% |
| 1930 | 430 / #272 / 0.039% |
| 1929 | 460 / #261 / 0.043% |
| 1928 | 446 / #269 / 0.040% |
| 1927 | 440 / #271 / 0.039% |
| 1926 | 432 / #273 / 0.039% |
| 1925 | 493 / #256 / 0.044% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 459 / #266 / 0.041% |
| 1923 | 429 / #272 / 0.039% |
| 1922 | 508 / #248 / 0.047% |
| 1921 | 438 / #267 / 0.040% |
| 1920 | 457 / #256 / 0.043% |
| 1919 | 415 / #261 / 0.042% |
| 1918 | 433 / #255 / 0.043% |
| 1917 | 388 / #257 / 0.042% |
| 1916 | 384 / #252 / 0.043% |
| 1915 | 335 / #264 / 0.039% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 287 / #254 / 0.044% |
| 1913 | 197 / #278 / 0.038% |
| 1912 | 171 / #268 / 0.040% |
| 1911 | 85 / #286 / 0.038% |
| 1910 | 86 / #263 / 0.044% |
| 1909 | 68 / #269 / 0.041% |
| 1908 | 61 / #274 / 0.040% |
| 1907 | 54 / #286 / 0.037% |
| 1906 | 54 / #266 / 0.041% |
| 1905 | 40 / #316 / 0.030% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 46 / #278 / 0.036% |
| 1903 | 41 / #294 / 0.034% |
| 1902 | 42 / #293 / 0.034% |
| 1901 | 42 / #265 / 0.039% |
| 1900 | 62 / #260 / 0.041% |
| 1899 | 53 / #228 / 0.050% |
| 1898 | 34 / #329 / 0.028% |
| 1897 | 37 / #300 / 0.033% |
| 1896 | 34 / #325 / 0.028% |
| 1895 | 31 / #330 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 46 / #256 / 0.040% |
| 1893 | 35 / #292 / 0.031% |
| 1892 | 37 / #304 / 0.030% |
| 1891 | 29 / #309 / 0.029% |
| 1890 | 35 / #290 / 0.032% |
| 1889 | 47 / #237 / 0.043% |
| 1888 | 41 / #281 / 0.034% |
| 1887 | 26 / #325 / 0.026% |
| 1886 | 43 / #259 / 0.039% |
| 1885 | 40 / #263 / 0.037% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 24 / #360 / 0.021% |
| 1883 | 21 / #373 / 0.020% |
| 1882 | 29 / #318 / 0.026% |
| 1881 | 24 / #332 / 0.024% |
| 1880 | 16 / #443 / 0.014% |