Total babies named Celia (all years): 56,363
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 382 / #734 / 0.024% |
| 2023 | 332 / #827 / 0.021% |
| 2022 | 323 / #861 / 0.020% |
| 2021 | 358 / #791 / 0.022% |
| 2020 | 345 / #790 / 0.021% |
| 2019 | 308 / #868 / 0.018% |
| 2018 | 287 / #931 / 0.017% |
| 2017 | 324 / #838 / 0.019% |
| 2016 | 344 / #835 / 0.019% |
| 2015 | 328 / #851 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 356 / #787 / 0.020% |
| 2013 | 355 / #768 / 0.020% |
| 2012 | 376 / #739 / 0.021% |
| 2011 | 372 / #741 / 0.021% |
| 2010 | 375 / #744 / 0.021% |
| 2009 | 376 / #755 / 0.020% |
| 2008 | 390 / #756 / 0.021% |
| 2007 | 370 / #779 / 0.019% |
| 2006 | 406 / #699 / 0.021% |
| 2005 | 410 / #678 / 0.022% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 406 / #676 / 0.022% |
| 2003 | 406 / #653 / 0.022% |
| 2002 | 388 / #652 / 0.022% |
| 2001 | 424 / #594 / 0.024% |
| 2000 | 410 / #619 / 0.023% |
| 1999 | 409 / #597 / 0.023% |
| 1998 | 384 / #619 / 0.022% |
| 1997 | 361 / #619 / 0.021% |
| 1996 | 336 / #662 / 0.019% |
| 1995 | 318 / #669 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 303 / #692 / 0.017% |
| 1993 | 343 / #651 / 0.019% |
| 1992 | 343 / #650 / 0.019% |
| 1991 | 352 / #635 / 0.019% |
| 1990 | 391 / #589 / 0.021% |
| 1989 | 310 / #659 / 0.017% |
| 1988 | 342 / #590 / 0.019% |
| 1987 | 330 / #590 / 0.019% |
| 1986 | 358 / #561 / 0.021% |
| 1985 | 406 / #500 / 0.024% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 502 / #424 / 0.030% |
| 1983 | 399 / #492 / 0.024% |
| 1982 | 258 / #681 / 0.015% |
| 1981 | 294 / #617 / 0.018% |
| 1980 | 277 / #656 / 0.017% |
| 1979 | 247 / #690 / 0.015% |
| 1978 | 218 / #724 / 0.014% |
| 1977 | 245 / #655 / 0.016% |
| 1976 | 209 / #705 / 0.014% |
| 1975 | 206 / #717 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 233 / #654 / 0.016% |
| 1973 | 233 / #645 / 0.016% |
| 1972 | 216 / #684 / 0.014% |
| 1971 | 278 / #612 / 0.017% |
| 1970 | 357 / #531 / 0.020% |
| 1969 | 237 / #644 / 0.014% |
| 1968 | 265 / #589 / 0.016% |
| 1967 | 270 / #581 / 0.016% |
| 1966 | 302 / #541 / 0.018% |
| 1965 | 357 / #503 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 377 / #502 / 0.020% |
| 1963 | 447 / #461 / 0.023% |
| 1962 | 555 / #414 / 0.028% |
| 1961 | 532 / #426 / 0.026% |
| 1960 | 540 / #416 / 0.027% |
| 1959 | 536 / #407 / 0.026% |
| 1958 | 530 / #401 / 0.026% |
| 1957 | 519 / #405 / 0.025% |
| 1956 | 560 / #372 / 0.028% |
| 1955 | 604 / #350 / 0.031% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 548 / #374 / 0.028% |
| 1953 | 579 / #349 / 0.031% |
| 1952 | 639 / #320 / 0.034% |
| 1951 | 578 / #329 / 0.032% |
| 1950 | 507 / #351 / 0.030% |
| 1949 | 498 / #349 / 0.029% |
| 1948 | 489 / #351 / 0.029% |
| 1947 | 456 / #375 / 0.026% |
| 1946 | 402 / #380 / 0.026% |
| 1945 | 377 / #357 / 0.029% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 428 / #331 / 0.032% |
| 1943 | 405 / #357 / 0.029% |
| 1942 | 407 / #348 / 0.030% |
| 1941 | 388 / #336 / 0.032% |
| 1940 | 381 / #327 / 0.033% |
| 1939 | 373 / #322 / 0.034% |
| 1938 | 413 / #307 / 0.037% |
| 1937 | 411 / #305 / 0.039% |
| 1936 | 419 / #298 / 0.040% |
| 1935 | 423 / #295 / 0.040% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 445 / #290 / 0.043% |
| 1933 | 430 / #292 / 0.043% |
| 1932 | 386 / #323 / 0.036% |
| 1931 | 490 / #282 / 0.046% |
| 1930 | 559 / #265 / 0.050% |
| 1929 | 510 / #288 / 0.046% |
| 1928 | 549 / #279 / 0.048% |
| 1927 | 607 / #267 / 0.051% |
| 1926 | 606 / #272 / 0.051% |
| 1925 | 661 / #258 / 0.054% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 662 / #256 / 0.053% |
| 1923 | 662 / #250 / 0.055% |
| 1922 | 679 / #253 / 0.057% |
| 1921 | 690 / #254 / 0.056% |
| 1920 | 726 / #242 / 0.061% |
| 1919 | 711 / #237 / 0.063% |
| 1918 | 791 / #224 / 0.068% |
| 1917 | 839 / #209 / 0.078% |
| 1916 | 810 / #214 / 0.078% |
| 1915 | 853 / #195 / 0.087% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 692 / #193 / 0.091% |
| 1913 | 532 / #200 / 0.085% |
| 1912 | 519 / #188 / 0.093% |
| 1911 | 410 / #178 / 0.098% |
| 1910 | 402 / #169 / 0.101% |
| 1909 | 324 / #185 / 0.093% |
| 1908 | 351 / #168 / 0.105% |
| 1907 | 314 / #178 / 0.099% |
| 1906 | 289 / #176 / 0.098% |
| 1905 | 270 / #185 / 0.093% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 293 / #170 / 0.106% |
| 1903 | 278 / #175 / 0.106% |
| 1902 | 285 / #167 / 0.108% |
| 1901 | 251 / #174 / 0.105% |
| 1900 | 316 / #173 / 0.105% |
| 1899 | 231 / #183 / 0.099% |
| 1898 | 265 / #174 / 0.102% |
| 1897 | 260 / #171 / 0.111% |
| 1896 | 258 / #171 / 0.108% |
| 1895 | 273 / #158 / 0.117% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 254 / #162 / 0.114% |
| 1893 | 219 / #169 / 0.103% |
| 1892 | 222 / #167 / 0.105% |
| 1891 | 187 / #177 / 0.101% |
| 1890 | 204 / #169 / 0.107% |
| 1889 | 167 / #176 / 0.094% |
| 1888 | 196 / #157 / 0.110% |
| 1887 | 154 / #160 / 0.105% |
| 1886 | 147 / #159 / 0.102% |
| 1885 | 153 / #148 / 0.115% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 122 / #159 / 0.095% |
| 1883 | 101 / #166 / 0.090% |
| 1882 | 126 / #141 / 0.117% |
| 1881 | 107 / #146 / 0.116% |
| 1880 | 90 / #152 / 0.099% |