Total babies named Claud (all years): 10,940
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2010 | 5 / #12592 / 0.000% |
| 1994 | 7 / #7084 / 0.000% |
| 1993 | 12 / #4755 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 9 / #5722 / 0.000% |
| 1991 | 6 / #7429 / 0.000% |
| 1990 | 7 / #6531 / 0.000% |
| 1989 | 9 / #5241 / 0.000% |
| 1988 | 6 / #6559 / 0.000% |
| 1986 | 7 / #5433 / 0.000% |
| 1985 | 5 / #6704 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 5 / #6479 / 0.000% |
| 1982 | 13 / #3317 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 12 / #3455 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 11 / #3657 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 13 / #3201 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 13 / #3095 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 10 / #3648 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 13 / #2973 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 6 / #4902 / 0.000% |
| 1974 | 11 / #3170 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1973 | 12 / #2885 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 15 / #2447 / 0.001% |
| 1971 | 22 / #1929 / 0.001% |
| 1970 | 20 / #2006 / 0.001% |
| 1969 | 13 / #2437 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 30 / #1432 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 26 / #1514 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 23 / #1619 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 26 / #1521 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 30 / #1439 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1963 | 36 / #1310 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 21 / #1769 / 0.001% |
| 1961 | 41 / #1236 / 0.002% |
| 1960 | 26 / #1592 / 0.001% |
| 1959 | 45 / #1159 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 33 / #1349 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 63 / #959 / 0.003% |
| 1956 | 47 / #1109 / 0.002% |
| 1955 | 58 / #988 / 0.003% |
| 1954 | 67 / #902 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1953 | 63 / #904 / 0.003% |
| 1952 | 48 / #1047 / 0.002% |
| 1951 | 79 / #791 / 0.004% |
| 1950 | 78 / #772 / 0.004% |
| 1949 | 72 / #810 / 0.004% |
| 1948 | 89 / #710 / 0.005% |
| 1947 | 103 / #682 / 0.006% |
| 1946 | 90 / #682 / 0.006% |
| 1945 | 73 / #710 / 0.005% |
| 1944 | 103 / #605 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1943 | 102 / #628 / 0.007% |
| 1942 | 101 / #630 / 0.007% |
| 1941 | 101 / #589 / 0.008% |
| 1940 | 113 / #557 / 0.010% |
| 1939 | 92 / #606 / 0.008% |
| 1938 | 111 / #548 / 0.010% |
| 1937 | 117 / #536 / 0.011% |
| 1936 | 127 / #506 / 0.012% |
| 1935 | 126 / #512 / 0.012% |
| 1934 | 144 / #473 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1933 | 145 / #461 / 0.015% |
| 1932 | 157 / #452 / 0.015% |
| 1931 | 180 / #420 / 0.017% |
| 1930 | 195 / #423 / 0.018% |
| 1929 | 194 / #422 / 0.018% |
| 1928 | 238 / #382 / 0.021% |
| 1927 | 243 / #376 / 0.022% |
| 1926 | 254 / #366 / 0.023% |
| 1925 | 309 / #327 / 0.028% |
| 1924 | 306 / #332 / 0.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1923 | 295 / #340 / 0.027% |
| 1922 | 289 / #348 / 0.027% |
| 1921 | 289 / #353 / 0.026% |
| 1920 | 309 / #330 / 0.029% |
| 1919 | 344 / #291 / 0.035% |
| 1918 | 319 / #317 / 0.031% |
| 1917 | 293 / #312 / 0.032% |
| 1916 | 308 / #293 / 0.035% |
| 1915 | 271 / #316 / 0.032% |
| 1914 | 187 / #339 / 0.029% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1913 | 162 / #316 / 0.032% |
| 1912 | 146 / #296 / 0.034% |
| 1911 | 97 / #263 / 0.043% |
| 1910 | 78 / #276 / 0.040% |
| 1909 | 73 / #260 / 0.045% |
| 1908 | 64 / #265 / 0.041% |
| 1907 | 82 / #225 / 0.056% |
| 1906 | 85 / #206 / 0.064% |
| 1905 | 90 / #195 / 0.068% |
| 1904 | 85 / #201 / 0.066% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1903 | 77 / #201 / 0.065% |
| 1902 | 76 / #204 / 0.062% |
| 1901 | 72 / #197 / 0.068% |
| 1900 | 107 / #189 / 0.071% |
| 1899 | 68 / #197 / 0.064% |
| 1898 | 61 / #225 / 0.050% |
| 1897 | 84 / #183 / 0.075% |
| 1896 | 90 / #178 / 0.075% |
| 1895 | 88 / #180 / 0.075% |
| 1894 | 97 / #158 / 0.084% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1893 | 96 / #153 / 0.085% |
| 1892 | 78 / #196 / 0.064% |
| 1891 | 74 / #176 / 0.073% |
| 1890 | 91 / #155 / 0.082% |
| 1889 | 88 / #156 / 0.080% |
| 1888 | 87 / #172 / 0.072% |
| 1887 | 77 / #163 / 0.076% |
| 1886 | 96 / #143 / 0.087% |
| 1885 | 97 / #139 / 0.090% |
| 1884 | 85 / #163 / 0.074% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 91 / #140 / 0.087% |
| 1882 | 90 / #153 / 0.079% |
| 1881 | 80 / #154 / 0.079% |
| 1880 | 90 / #151 / 0.081% |