Total babies named Dixie (all years): 45,241
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 135 / #1565 / 0.008% |
| 2023 | 197 / #1208 / 0.012% |
| 2022 | 207 / #1167 / 0.013% |
| 2021 | 237 / #1063 / 0.014% |
| 2020 | 229 / #1079 / 0.014% |
| 2019 | 259 / #996 / 0.015% |
| 2018 | 257 / #1011 / 0.015% |
| 2017 | 226 / #1116 / 0.013% |
| 2016 | 256 / #1034 / 0.014% |
| 2015 | 288 / #941 / 0.016% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 345 / #808 / 0.019% |
| 2013 | 293 / #883 / 0.017% |
| 2012 | 313 / #853 / 0.018% |
| 2011 | 310 / #849 / 0.018% |
| 2010 | 282 / #921 / 0.016% |
| 2009 | 289 / #926 / 0.016% |
| 2008 | 278 / #963 / 0.015% |
| 2007 | 295 / #919 / 0.015% |
| 2006 | 148 / #1490 / 0.008% |
| 2005 | 151 / #1419 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 116 / #1670 / 0.006% |
| 2003 | 136 / #1447 / 0.007% |
| 2002 | 124 / #1522 / 0.007% |
| 2001 | 148 / #1299 / 0.008% |
| 2000 | 114 / #1559 / 0.006% |
| 1999 | 99 / #1669 / 0.006% |
| 1998 | 81 / #1891 / 0.005% |
| 1997 | 81 / #1829 / 0.005% |
| 1996 | 108 / #1498 / 0.006% |
| 1995 | 89 / #1655 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 95 / #1599 / 0.005% |
| 1993 | 117 / #1392 / 0.006% |
| 1992 | 100 / #1554 / 0.005% |
| 1991 | 120 / #1362 / 0.006% |
| 1990 | 105 / #1489 / 0.006% |
| 1989 | 131 / #1226 / 0.007% |
| 1988 | 79 / #1648 / 0.004% |
| 1987 | 91 / #1436 / 0.005% |
| 1986 | 75 / #1590 / 0.004% |
| 1985 | 103 / #1298 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 113 / #1175 / 0.007% |
| 1983 | 151 / #969 / 0.009% |
| 1982 | 125 / #1127 / 0.007% |
| 1981 | 135 / #1056 / 0.008% |
| 1980 | 172 / #889 / 0.010% |
| 1979 | 116 / #1146 / 0.007% |
| 1978 | 140 / #987 / 0.009% |
| 1977 | 186 / #807 / 0.012% |
| 1976 | 172 / #808 / 0.012% |
| 1975 | 203 / #724 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 182 / #766 / 0.012% |
| 1973 | 187 / #747 / 0.013% |
| 1972 | 190 / #734 / 0.012% |
| 1971 | 153 / #877 / 0.009% |
| 1970 | 160 / #845 / 0.009% |
| 1969 | 182 / #752 / 0.011% |
| 1968 | 157 / #804 / 0.010% |
| 1967 | 160 / #787 / 0.010% |
| 1966 | 219 / #652 / 0.013% |
| 1965 | 208 / #680 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 323 / #552 / 0.017% |
| 1963 | 348 / #522 / 0.018% |
| 1962 | 361 / #512 / 0.018% |
| 1961 | 381 / #497 / 0.019% |
| 1960 | 457 / #457 / 0.023% |
| 1959 | 490 / #433 / 0.024% |
| 1958 | 494 / #421 / 0.025% |
| 1957 | 610 / #367 / 0.030% |
| 1956 | 627 / #347 / 0.031% |
| 1955 | 649 / #335 / 0.033% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 747 / #310 / 0.038% |
| 1953 | 942 / #265 / 0.050% |
| 1952 | 771 / #291 / 0.042% |
| 1951 | 752 / #286 / 0.042% |
| 1950 | 687 / #295 / 0.040% |
| 1949 | 849 / #263 / 0.050% |
| 1948 | 865 / #256 / 0.051% |
| 1947 | 1,063 / #228 / 0.060% |
| 1946 | 986 / #228 / 0.063% |
| 1945 | 884 / #215 / 0.068% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 944 / #208 / 0.071% |
| 1943 | 1,044 / #202 / 0.075% |
| 1942 | 1,061 / #193 / 0.079% |
| 1941 | 1,046 / #181 / 0.087% |
| 1940 | 1,170 / #171 / 0.102% |
| 1939 | 1,175 / #169 / 0.107% |
| 1938 | 1,229 / #167 / 0.111% |
| 1937 | 1,161 / #174 / 0.109% |
| 1936 | 1,105 / #174 / 0.106% |
| 1935 | 930 / #188 / 0.089% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 833 / #214 / 0.080% |
| 1933 | 646 / #240 / 0.064% |
| 1932 | 629 / #247 / 0.059% |
| 1931 | 617 / #244 / 0.058% |
| 1930 | 512 / #291 / 0.045% |
| 1929 | 358 / #343 / 0.032% |
| 1928 | 387 / #343 / 0.034% |
| 1927 | 372 / #349 / 0.031% |
| 1926 | 369 / #347 / 0.031% |
| 1925 | 340 / #372 / 0.028% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 388 / #339 / 0.031% |
| 1923 | 330 / #367 / 0.027% |
| 1922 | 306 / #372 / 0.025% |
| 1921 | 322 / #376 / 0.026% |
| 1920 | 326 / #364 / 0.027% |
| 1919 | 307 / #369 / 0.027% |
| 1918 | 350 / #352 / 0.030% |
| 1917 | 255 / #395 / 0.024% |
| 1916 | 235 / #407 / 0.023% |
| 1915 | 206 / #422 / 0.021% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 164 / #414 / 0.022% |
| 1913 | 155 / #389 / 0.025% |
| 1912 | 129 / #410 / 0.023% |
| 1911 | 92 / #425 / 0.022% |
| 1910 | 86 / #429 / 0.022% |
| 1909 | 87 / #391 / 0.025% |
| 1908 | 74 / #420 / 0.022% |
| 1907 | 67 / #435 / 0.021% |
| 1906 | 70 / #409 / 0.024% |
| 1905 | 53 / #465 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 50 / #465 / 0.018% |
| 1903 | 57 / #422 / 0.022% |
| 1902 | 48 / #454 / 0.018% |
| 1901 | 32 / #540 / 0.013% |
| 1900 | 54 / #458 / 0.018% |
| 1899 | 45 / #434 / 0.019% |
| 1898 | 48 / #444 / 0.019% |
| 1897 | 34 / #498 / 0.015% |
| 1896 | 40 / #457 / 0.017% |
| 1895 | 32 / #523 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 38 / #451 / 0.017% |
| 1893 | 31 / #489 / 0.015% |
| 1892 | 36 / #454 / 0.017% |
| 1891 | 29 / #477 / 0.016% |
| 1890 | 41 / #397 / 0.022% |
| 1889 | 39 / #389 / 0.022% |
| 1888 | 38 / #397 / 0.021% |
| 1887 | 29 / #403 / 0.020% |
| 1886 | 22 / #464 / 0.015% |
| 1885 | 24 / #432 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 27 / #386 / 0.021% |
| 1883 | 16 / #486 / 0.014% |
| 1882 | 20 / #408 / 0.019% |
| 1881 | 10 / #547 / 0.011% |
| 1880 | 15 / #437 / 0.016% |