Total babies named Eloise (all years): 68,540
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 3,430 / #64 / 0.213% |
| 2023 | 2,921 / #81 / 0.182% |
| 2022 | 2,904 / #86 / 0.177% |
| 2021 | 2,547 / #109 / 0.155% |
| 2020 | 1,969 / #137 / 0.122% |
| 2019 | 1,902 / #149 / 0.113% |
| 2018 | 1,743 / #166 / 0.103% |
| 2017 | 1,630 / #190 / 0.094% |
| 2016 | 1,566 / #208 / 0.088% |
| 2015 | 1,265 / #254 / 0.071% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1,081 / #302 / 0.061% |
| 2013 | 955 / #337 / 0.054% |
| 2012 | 860 / #363 / 0.049% |
| 2011 | 679 / #449 / 0.039% |
| 2010 | 553 / #529 / 0.031% |
| 2009 | 297 / #913 / 0.016% |
| 2008 | 265 / #999 / 0.014% |
| 2007 | 191 / #1283 / 0.010% |
| 2006 | 179 / #1309 / 0.009% |
| 2005 | 165 / #1330 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 148 / #1406 / 0.008% |
| 2003 | 103 / #1818 / 0.006% |
| 2002 | 88 / #1990 / 0.005% |
| 2001 | 78 / #2117 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 59 / #2550 / 0.003% |
| 1999 | 54 / #2618 / 0.003% |
| 1998 | 53 / #2582 / 0.003% |
| 1997 | 36 / #3245 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 29 / #3754 / 0.002% |
| 1995 | 39 / #2988 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 44 / #2767 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 25 / #4136 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 27 / #3900 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 24 / #4241 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 28 / #3739 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 29 / #3503 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 28 / #3418 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 30 / #3121 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 22 / #3793 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 29 / #3106 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 24 / #3444 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 34 / #2608 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 41 / #2383 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 48 / #2128 / 0.003% |
| 1980 | 29 / #3019 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 39 / #2399 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 27 / #2960 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 22 / #3408 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 37 / #2267 / 0.003% |
| 1975 | 38 / #2209 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 29 / #2570 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 55 / #1655 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 50 / #1753 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 63 / #1551 / 0.004% |
| 1970 | 69 / #1466 / 0.004% |
| 1969 | 59 / #1550 / 0.004% |
| 1968 | 84 / #1181 / 0.005% |
| 1967 | 85 / #1152 / 0.005% |
| 1966 | 103 / #1017 / 0.006% |
| 1965 | 138 / #855 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 126 / #942 / 0.007% |
| 1963 | 163 / #812 / 0.008% |
| 1962 | 183 / #769 / 0.009% |
| 1961 | 177 / #789 / 0.009% |
| 1960 | 187 / #748 / 0.009% |
| 1959 | 218 / #679 / 0.011% |
| 1958 | 232 / #649 / 0.012% |
| 1957 | 310 / #544 / 0.015% |
| 1956 | 348 / #503 / 0.017% |
| 1955 | 331 / #508 / 0.017% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 355 / #469 / 0.018% |
| 1953 | 438 / #408 / 0.023% |
| 1952 | 432 / #400 / 0.023% |
| 1951 | 488 / #365 / 0.027% |
| 1950 | 524 / #341 / 0.031% |
| 1949 | 483 / #359 / 0.028% |
| 1948 | 512 / #343 / 0.030% |
| 1947 | 580 / #327 / 0.033% |
| 1946 | 608 / #296 / 0.039% |
| 1945 | 546 / #292 / 0.042% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 597 / #281 / 0.045% |
| 1943 | 715 / #259 / 0.051% |
| 1942 | 746 / #250 / 0.055% |
| 1941 | 584 / #266 / 0.048% |
| 1940 | 512 / #277 / 0.045% |
| 1939 | 531 / #269 / 0.048% |
| 1938 | 608 / #256 / 0.055% |
| 1937 | 636 / #250 / 0.060% |
| 1936 | 611 / #250 / 0.059% |
| 1935 | 729 / #230 / 0.070% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 719 / #235 / 0.069% |
| 1933 | 819 / #210 / 0.081% |
| 1932 | 867 / #208 / 0.081% |
| 1931 | 926 / #197 / 0.087% |
| 1930 | 1,023 / #189 / 0.091% |
| 1929 | 1,013 / #194 / 0.091% |
| 1928 | 1,082 / #190 / 0.094% |
| 1927 | 1,162 / #180 / 0.097% |
| 1926 | 1,208 / #175 / 0.102% |
| 1925 | 1,212 / #180 / 0.100% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,212 / #185 / 0.097% |
| 1923 | 1,193 / #181 / 0.099% |
| 1922 | 1,222 / #179 / 0.102% |
| 1921 | 1,379 / #164 / 0.112% |
| 1920 | 1,239 / #178 / 0.103% |
| 1919 | 1,030 / #188 / 0.091% |
| 1918 | 1,063 / #189 / 0.092% |
| 1917 | 964 / #191 / 0.089% |
| 1916 | 953 / #187 / 0.091% |
| 1915 | 798 / #207 / 0.081% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 663 / #198 / 0.087% |
| 1913 | 529 / #202 / 0.085% |
| 1912 | 474 / #202 / 0.085% |
| 1911 | 324 / #219 / 0.077% |
| 1910 | 273 / #236 / 0.069% |
| 1909 | 243 / #230 / 0.070% |
| 1908 | 201 / #239 / 0.060% |
| 1907 | 196 / #240 / 0.062% |
| 1906 | 176 / #244 / 0.060% |
| 1905 | 151 / #267 / 0.052% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 120 / #295 / 0.044% |
| 1903 | 134 / #264 / 0.051% |
| 1902 | 124 / #281 / 0.047% |
| 1901 | 88 / #321 / 0.037% |
| 1900 | 107 / #328 / 0.036% |
| 1899 | 92 / #312 / 0.039% |
| 1898 | 91 / #328 / 0.035% |
| 1897 | 68 / #355 / 0.029% |
| 1896 | 77 / #332 / 0.032% |
| 1895 | 57 / #372 / 0.024% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 56 / #373 / 0.025% |
| 1893 | 52 / #374 / 0.024% |
| 1892 | 56 / #353 / 0.026% |
| 1891 | 46 / #367 / 0.025% |
| 1890 | 46 / #370 / 0.024% |
| 1889 | 35 / #412 / 0.020% |
| 1888 | 34 / #426 / 0.019% |
| 1887 | 31 / #393 / 0.021% |
| 1886 | 38 / #348 / 0.026% |
| 1885 | 30 / #375 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 19 / #467 / 0.015% |
| 1883 | 18 / #453 / 0.016% |
| 1882 | 12 / #538 / 0.011% |
| 1881 | 14 / #455 / 0.015% |
| 1880 | 11 / #526 / 0.012% |