Total babies named Ervin (all years): 39,018
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 81 / #1935 / 0.005% |
| 2023 | 86 / #1851 / 0.005% |
| 2022 | 101 / #1695 / 0.006% |
| 2021 | 81 / #1891 / 0.005% |
| 2020 | 93 / #1687 / 0.005% |
| 2019 | 108 / #1551 / 0.006% |
| 2018 | 101 / #1617 / 0.006% |
| 2017 | 114 / #1480 / 0.006% |
| 2016 | 91 / #1708 / 0.005% |
| 2015 | 98 / #1628 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 109 / #1487 / 0.006% |
| 2013 | 130 / #1323 / 0.007% |
| 2012 | 109 / #1481 / 0.006% |
| 2011 | 115 / #1431 / 0.006% |
| 2010 | 112 / #1464 / 0.006% |
| 2009 | 132 / #1317 / 0.007% |
| 2008 | 138 / #1268 / 0.007% |
| 2007 | 147 / #1199 / 0.007% |
| 2006 | 140 / #1197 / 0.007% |
| 2005 | 136 / #1172 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 118 / #1275 / 0.006% |
| 2003 | 173 / #948 / 0.009% |
| 2002 | 141 / #1074 / 0.007% |
| 2001 | 136 / #1063 / 0.007% |
| 2000 | 128 / #1099 / 0.007% |
| 1999 | 118 / #1121 / 0.006% |
| 1998 | 115 / #1115 / 0.006% |
| 1997 | 144 / #938 / 0.008% |
| 1996 | 152 / #889 / 0.008% |
| 1995 | 143 / #926 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 137 / #944 / 0.007% |
| 1993 | 169 / #813 / 0.009% |
| 1992 | 207 / #716 / 0.010% |
| 1991 | 164 / #806 / 0.008% |
| 1990 | 159 / #804 / 0.008% |
| 1989 | 158 / #789 / 0.008% |
| 1988 | 195 / #676 / 0.010% |
| 1987 | 161 / #721 / 0.009% |
| 1986 | 141 / #766 / 0.008% |
| 1985 | 132 / #772 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 159 / #690 / 0.009% |
| 1983 | 155 / #690 / 0.009% |
| 1982 | 164 / #678 / 0.009% |
| 1981 | 178 / #638 / 0.010% |
| 1980 | 173 / #660 / 0.010% |
| 1979 | 165 / #666 / 0.010% |
| 1978 | 157 / #669 / 0.010% |
| 1977 | 151 / #691 / 0.009% |
| 1976 | 145 / #690 / 0.009% |
| 1975 | 156 / #659 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 180 / #598 / 0.011% |
| 1973 | 175 / #593 / 0.011% |
| 1972 | 222 / #534 / 0.014% |
| 1971 | 219 / #545 / 0.012% |
| 1970 | 206 / #567 / 0.011% |
| 1969 | 215 / #535 / 0.012% |
| 1968 | 218 / #511 / 0.013% |
| 1967 | 231 / #493 / 0.013% |
| 1966 | 247 / #485 / 0.014% |
| 1965 | 297 / #450 / 0.016% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 255 / #494 / 0.013% |
| 1963 | 308 / #451 / 0.015% |
| 1962 | 325 / #441 / 0.016% |
| 1961 | 328 / #444 / 0.015% |
| 1960 | 334 / #440 / 0.016% |
| 1959 | 415 / #388 / 0.019% |
| 1958 | 377 / #401 / 0.018% |
| 1957 | 418 / #378 / 0.019% |
| 1956 | 433 / #355 / 0.020% |
| 1955 | 422 / #351 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 448 / #336 / 0.022% |
| 1953 | 455 / #330 / 0.023% |
| 1952 | 430 / #333 / 0.022% |
| 1951 | 465 / #321 / 0.025% |
| 1950 | 424 / #328 / 0.024% |
| 1949 | 453 / #323 / 0.026% |
| 1948 | 480 / #310 / 0.027% |
| 1947 | 493 / #310 / 0.027% |
| 1946 | 421 / #314 / 0.026% |
| 1945 | 419 / #290 / 0.031% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 419 / #290 / 0.031% |
| 1943 | 484 / #277 / 0.034% |
| 1942 | 490 / #269 / 0.035% |
| 1941 | 450 / #266 / 0.037% |
| 1940 | 416 / #274 / 0.036% |
| 1939 | 432 / #259 / 0.039% |
| 1938 | 488 / #241 / 0.044% |
| 1937 | 422 / #262 / 0.040% |
| 1936 | 483 / #235 / 0.047% |
| 1935 | 497 / #234 / 0.048% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 537 / #223 / 0.052% |
| 1933 | 467 / #241 / 0.047% |
| 1932 | 550 / #219 / 0.053% |
| 1931 | 569 / #218 / 0.055% |
| 1930 | 625 / #211 / 0.057% |
| 1929 | 645 / #205 / 0.060% |
| 1928 | 672 / #203 / 0.061% |
| 1927 | 763 / #189 / 0.068% |
| 1926 | 768 / #187 / 0.069% |
| 1925 | 737 / #187 / 0.066% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 729 / #192 / 0.064% |
| 1923 | 788 / #177 / 0.072% |
| 1922 | 791 / #177 / 0.073% |
| 1921 | 859 / #172 / 0.078% |
| 1920 | 843 / #163 / 0.079% |
| 1919 | 803 / #169 / 0.082% |
| 1918 | 806 / #168 / 0.080% |
| 1917 | 718 / #174 / 0.078% |
| 1916 | 692 / #173 / 0.078% |
| 1915 | 582 / #190 / 0.069% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 494 / #180 / 0.075% |
| 1913 | 347 / #195 / 0.068% |
| 1912 | 294 / #196 / 0.068% |
| 1911 | 144 / #205 / 0.064% |
| 1910 | 131 / #199 / 0.067% |
| 1909 | 103 / #206 / 0.063% |
| 1908 | 97 / #209 / 0.063% |
| 1907 | 116 / #186 / 0.079% |
| 1906 | 101 / #178 / 0.076% |
| 1905 | 112 / #172 / 0.085% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 81 / #202 / 0.063% |
| 1903 | 58 / #242 / 0.049% |
| 1902 | 76 / #206 / 0.062% |
| 1901 | 63 / #215 / 0.059% |
| 1900 | 88 / #209 / 0.058% |
| 1899 | 53 / #229 / 0.050% |
| 1898 | 68 / #211 / 0.055% |
| 1897 | 55 / #235 / 0.049% |
| 1896 | 55 / #246 / 0.046% |
| 1895 | 51 / #252 / 0.043% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 56 / #228 / 0.048% |
| 1893 | 42 / #269 / 0.037% |
| 1892 | 52 / #246 / 0.043% |
| 1891 | 35 / #274 / 0.035% |
| 1890 | 43 / #262 / 0.039% |
| 1889 | 52 / #224 / 0.047% |
| 1888 | 54 / #237 / 0.045% |
| 1887 | 35 / #272 / 0.035% |
| 1886 | 32 / #303 / 0.029% |
| 1885 | 35 / #283 / 0.032% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 51 / #237 / 0.045% |
| 1883 | 46 / #232 / 0.044% |
| 1882 | 44 / #258 / 0.039% |
| 1881 | 32 / #279 / 0.032% |
| 1880 | 30 / #307 / 0.027% |