Total babies named Garnet (all years): 8,909
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 / #16044 / 0.000% |
| 2023 | 13 / #8197 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 11 / #9255 / 0.001% |
| 2021 | 14 / #7755 / 0.001% |
| 2020 | 9 / #10545 / 0.001% |
| 2019 | 9 / #10766 / 0.001% |
| 2018 | 9 / #10848 / 0.001% |
| 2017 | 15 / #7582 / 0.001% |
| 2016 | 15 / #7728 / 0.001% |
| 2015 | 7 / #13476 / 0.000% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | — |
| 2013 | 7 / #13654 / 0.000% |
| 2011 | 11 / #9942 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 5 / #17914 / 0.000% |
| 2009 | 9 / #11797 / 0.000% |
| 2008 | 5 / #18454 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | — |
| 2006 | 5 / #18081 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 9 / #11204 / 0.000% |
| 2003 | — |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2002 | 6 / #14183 / 0.000% |
| 2001 | — |
| 2000 | 5 / #15863 / 0.000% |
| 1999 | — |
| 1998 | 8 / #10438 / 0.000% |
| 1997 | — |
| 1996 | — |
| 1995 | 6 / #12283 / 0.000% |
| 1994 | 6 / #12301 / 0.000% |
| 1992 | 6 / #12273 / 0.000% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1991 | 5 / #13885 / 0.000% |
| 1990 | 7 / #10576 / 0.000% |
| 1989 | 8 / #9017 / 0.000% |
| 1988 | 7 / #9583 / 0.000% |
| 1987 | 5 / #11908 / 0.000% |
| 1986 | 12 / #5882 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 6 / #9697 / 0.000% |
| 1984 | 8 / #7616 / 0.000% |
| 1983 | 5 / #10811 / 0.000% |
| 1982 | — |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1981 | 13 / #5357 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 14 / #5061 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 10 / #6345 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 11 / #5677 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 9 / #6509 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 8 / #6815 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 16 / #4003 / 0.001% |
| 1974 | 18 / #3596 / 0.001% |
| 1973 | 10 / #5299 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 8 / #6132 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1971 | 16 / #3839 / 0.001% |
| 1970 | 13 / #4322 / 0.001% |
| 1969 | 20 / #3044 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 23 / #2656 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 20 / #2807 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 27 / #2318 / 0.002% |
| 1965 | 17 / #3089 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 20 / #2852 / 0.001% |
| 1963 | 20 / #2808 / 0.001% |
| 1962 | 24 / #2484 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1961 | 28 / #2262 / 0.001% |
| 1960 | 28 / #2211 / 0.001% |
| 1959 | 30 / #2070 / 0.001% |
| 1958 | 24 / #2345 / 0.001% |
| 1957 | 42 / #1663 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 35 / #1809 / 0.002% |
| 1955 | 40 / #1622 / 0.002% |
| 1954 | 49 / #1439 / 0.003% |
| 1953 | 60 / #1253 / 0.003% |
| 1952 | 53 / #1323 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1951 | 57 / #1228 / 0.003% |
| 1950 | 53 / #1261 / 0.003% |
| 1949 | 39 / #1475 / 0.002% |
| 1948 | 53 / #1255 / 0.003% |
| 1947 | 59 / #1175 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 60 / #1101 / 0.004% |
| 1945 | 59 / #1005 / 0.005% |
| 1944 | 66 / #956 / 0.005% |
| 1943 | 78 / #885 / 0.006% |
| 1942 | 107 / #722 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1941 | 73 / #852 / 0.006% |
| 1940 | 93 / #721 / 0.008% |
| 1939 | 70 / #831 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 93 / #711 / 0.008% |
| 1937 | 104 / #666 / 0.010% |
| 1936 | 77 / #770 / 0.007% |
| 1935 | 97 / #676 / 0.009% |
| 1934 | 89 / #706 / 0.009% |
| 1933 | 112 / #613 / 0.011% |
| 1932 | 101 / #671 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1931 | 108 / #640 / 0.010% |
| 1930 | 106 / #668 / 0.009% |
| 1929 | 139 / #583 / 0.012% |
| 1928 | 117 / #649 / 0.010% |
| 1927 | 138 / #606 / 0.012% |
| 1926 | 138 / #603 / 0.012% |
| 1925 | 156 / #575 / 0.013% |
| 1924 | 166 / #567 / 0.013% |
| 1923 | 187 / #511 / 0.016% |
| 1922 | 163 / #559 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1921 | 203 / #485 / 0.016% |
| 1920 | 250 / #422 / 0.021% |
| 1919 | 221 / #443 / 0.020% |
| 1918 | 258 / #407 / 0.022% |
| 1917 | 232 / #417 / 0.021% |
| 1916 | 209 / #436 / 0.020% |
| 1915 | 193 / #442 / 0.020% |
| 1914 | 158 / #428 / 0.021% |
| 1913 | 133 / #427 / 0.021% |
| 1912 | 107 / #459 / 0.019% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1911 | 116 / #378 / 0.028% |
| 1910 | 74 / #464 / 0.019% |
| 1909 | 80 / #408 / 0.023% |
| 1908 | 70 / #432 / 0.021% |
| 1907 | 77 / #405 / 0.024% |
| 1906 | 67 / #418 / 0.023% |
| 1905 | 51 / #478 / 0.017% |
| 1904 | 43 / #503 / 0.016% |
| 1903 | 44 / #485 / 0.017% |
| 1902 | 37 / #529 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1901 | 45 / #444 / 0.019% |
| 1900 | 29 / #663 / 0.010% |
| 1899 | 32 / #529 / 0.014% |
| 1898 | 35 / #533 / 0.014% |
| 1897 | 35 / #492 / 0.015% |
| 1896 | 29 / #569 / 0.012% |
| 1895 | 22 / #667 / 0.009% |
| 1894 | 22 / #633 / 0.010% |
| 1893 | 23 / #605 / 0.011% |
| 1892 | 16 / #740 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1891 | 16 / #678 / 0.009% |
| 1890 | 15 / #704 / 0.008% |
| 1889 | 11 / #821 / 0.006% |
| 1887 | 10 / #755 / 0.007% |
| 1886 | 5 / #1174 / 0.003% |
| 1885 | 8 / #815 / 0.006% |
| 1884 | 7 / #881 / 0.005% |
| 1882 | — |