Total babies named Harley (all years): 70,909
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 218 / #1017 / 0.013% |
| 2023 | 221 / #998 / 0.013% |
| 2022 | 251 / #920 / 0.014% |
| 2021 | 247 / #920 / 0.014% |
| 2020 | 300 / #781 / 0.017% |
| 2019 | 286 / #804 / 0.016% |
| 2018 | 300 / #775 / 0.017% |
| 2017 | 401 / #647 / 0.022% |
| 2016 | 379 / #674 / 0.020% |
| 2015 | 395 / #654 / 0.021% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 411 / #640 / 0.021% |
| 2013 | 402 / #617 / 0.021% |
| 2012 | 384 / #632 / 0.020% |
| 2011 | 369 / #634 / 0.019% |
| 2010 | 448 / #566 / 0.023% |
| 2009 | 464 / #572 / 0.023% |
| 2008 | 422 / #595 / 0.021% |
| 2007 | 419 / #601 / 0.020% |
| 2006 | 498 / #518 / 0.024% |
| 2005 | 486 / #505 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 560 / #461 / 0.028% |
| 2003 | 615 / #417 / 0.031% |
| 2002 | 581 / #428 / 0.030% |
| 2001 | 529 / #458 / 0.027% |
| 2000 | 538 / #444 / 0.027% |
| 1999 | 498 / #459 / 0.026% |
| 1998 | 541 / #429 / 0.028% |
| 1997 | 566 / #409 / 0.030% |
| 1996 | 605 / #388 / 0.032% |
| 1995 | 652 / #366 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 789 / #322 / 0.041% |
| 1993 | 728 / #342 / 0.037% |
| 1992 | 557 / #407 / 0.028% |
| 1991 | 350 / #543 / 0.017% |
| 1990 | 292 / #589 / 0.014% |
| 1989 | 269 / #596 / 0.013% |
| 1988 | 228 / #627 / 0.012% |
| 1987 | 189 / #667 / 0.010% |
| 1986 | 203 / #628 / 0.011% |
| 1985 | 226 / #582 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 209 / #585 / 0.012% |
| 1983 | 213 / #578 / 0.012% |
| 1982 | 247 / #548 / 0.014% |
| 1981 | 244 / #536 / 0.014% |
| 1980 | 281 / #508 / 0.016% |
| 1979 | 244 / #547 / 0.014% |
| 1978 | 237 / #538 / 0.014% |
| 1977 | 189 / #613 / 0.012% |
| 1976 | 169 / #632 / 0.011% |
| 1975 | 141 / #700 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 169 / #620 / 0.011% |
| 1973 | 130 / #704 / 0.008% |
| 1972 | 135 / #689 / 0.008% |
| 1971 | 134 / #716 / 0.008% |
| 1970 | 129 / #725 / 0.007% |
| 1969 | 113 / #736 / 0.006% |
| 1968 | 123 / #679 / 0.007% |
| 1967 | 125 / #669 / 0.007% |
| 1966 | 140 / #627 / 0.008% |
| 1965 | 124 / #667 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 147 / #643 / 0.007% |
| 1963 | 134 / #677 / 0.007% |
| 1962 | 138 / #662 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 167 / #614 / 0.008% |
| 1960 | 172 / #598 / 0.008% |
| 1959 | 177 / #587 / 0.008% |
| 1958 | 177 / #583 / 0.008% |
| 1957 | 234 / #508 / 0.011% |
| 1956 | 237 / #492 / 0.011% |
| 1955 | 225 / #490 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 243 / #468 / 0.012% |
| 1953 | 256 / #448 / 0.013% |
| 1952 | 272 / #420 / 0.014% |
| 1951 | 257 / #425 / 0.014% |
| 1950 | 265 / #413 / 0.015% |
| 1949 | 303 / #385 / 0.017% |
| 1948 | 295 / #396 / 0.017% |
| 1947 | 336 / #374 / 0.018% |
| 1946 | 318 / #366 / 0.020% |
| 1945 | 308 / #343 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 309 / #340 / 0.023% |
| 1943 | 355 / #325 / 0.025% |
| 1942 | 319 / #341 / 0.023% |
| 1941 | 326 / #326 / 0.027% |
| 1940 | 346 / #300 / 0.030% |
| 1939 | 333 / #305 / 0.030% |
| 1938 | 350 / #292 / 0.032% |
| 1937 | 363 / #284 / 0.034% |
| 1936 | 354 / #287 / 0.034% |
| 1935 | 364 / #284 / 0.035% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 375 / #278 / 0.036% |
| 1933 | 352 / #280 / 0.036% |
| 1932 | 396 / #275 / 0.038% |
| 1931 | 440 / #259 / 0.042% |
| 1930 | 454 / #264 / 0.041% |
| 1929 | 427 / #269 / 0.040% |
| 1928 | 484 / #254 / 0.044% |
| 1927 | 456 / #267 / 0.040% |
| 1926 | 492 / #253 / 0.044% |
| 1925 | 462 / #264 / 0.041% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 522 / #252 / 0.046% |
| 1923 | 478 / #256 / 0.044% |
| 1922 | 525 / #247 / 0.048% |
| 1921 | 537 / #242 / 0.049% |
| 1920 | 484 / #250 / 0.045% |
| 1919 | 452 / #249 / 0.046% |
| 1918 | 491 / #240 / 0.048% |
| 1917 | 430 / #243 / 0.046% |
| 1916 | 454 / #234 / 0.051% |
| 1915 | 434 / #229 / 0.051% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 322 / #235 / 0.049% |
| 1913 | 204 / #269 / 0.040% |
| 1912 | 197 / #253 / 0.046% |
| 1911 | 88 / #279 / 0.039% |
| 1910 | 89 / #259 / 0.046% |
| 1909 | 73 / #261 / 0.045% |
| 1908 | 71 / #251 / 0.046% |
| 1907 | 75 / #238 / 0.051% |
| 1906 | 52 / #275 / 0.039% |
| 1905 | 69 / #238 / 0.052% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 56 / #257 / 0.044% |
| 1903 | 65 / #226 / 0.055% |
| 1902 | 83 / #196 / 0.068% |
| 1901 | 63 / #217 / 0.059% |
| 1900 | 79 / #225 / 0.053% |
| 1899 | 59 / #220 / 0.056% |
| 1898 | 71 / #208 / 0.058% |
| 1897 | 82 / #186 / 0.073% |
| 1896 | 64 / #222 / 0.054% |
| 1895 | 68 / #209 / 0.058% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 63 / #213 / 0.054% |
| 1893 | 76 / #191 / 0.068% |
| 1892 | 91 / #174 / 0.075% |
| 1891 | 64 / #195 / 0.063% |
| 1890 | 52 / #231 / 0.047% |
| 1889 | 60 / #214 / 0.054% |
| 1888 | 82 / #182 / 0.068% |
| 1887 | 77 / #164 / 0.076% |
| 1886 | 73 / #183 / 0.066% |
| 1885 | 51 / #232 / 0.047% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 73 / #189 / 0.064% |
| 1883 | 63 / #188 / 0.060% |
| 1882 | 75 / #181 / 0.066% |
| 1881 | 61 / #188 / 0.061% |
| 1880 | 70 / #181 / 0.063% |