Total babies named Iris (all years): 98,551
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 3,124 / #71 / 0.194% |
| 2023 | 2,936 / #78 / 0.183% |
| 2022 | 2,933 / #84 / 0.179% |
| 2021 | 2,581 / #108 / 0.157% |
| 2020 | 2,177 / #127 / 0.135% |
| 2019 | 2,193 / #128 / 0.131% |
| 2018 | 2,128 / #138 / 0.125% |
| 2017 | 1,990 / #149 / 0.115% |
| 2016 | 1,751 / #186 / 0.099% |
| 2015 | 1,509 / #216 / 0.085% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1,330 / #244 / 0.074% |
| 2013 | 1,251 / #254 / 0.071% |
| 2012 | 1,134 / #281 / 0.064% |
| 2011 | 1,051 / #303 / 0.060% |
| 2010 | 1,011 / #315 / 0.057% |
| 2009 | 1,037 / #316 / 0.056% |
| 2008 | 973 / #342 / 0.051% |
| 2007 | 1,066 / #317 / 0.055% |
| 2006 | 880 / #369 / 0.046% |
| 2005 | 879 / #357 / 0.048% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 832 / #376 / 0.045% |
| 2003 | 786 / #388 / 0.043% |
| 2002 | 772 / #383 / 0.043% |
| 2001 | 733 / #397 / 0.041% |
| 2000 | 685 / #414 / 0.038% |
| 1999 | 674 / #414 / 0.038% |
| 1998 | 570 / #454 / 0.032% |
| 1997 | 481 / #506 / 0.028% |
| 1996 | 453 / #520 / 0.026% |
| 1995 | 491 / #500 / 0.028% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 519 / #483 / 0.029% |
| 1993 | 539 / #471 / 0.030% |
| 1992 | 564 / #448 / 0.031% |
| 1991 | 641 / #398 / 0.034% |
| 1990 | 610 / #417 / 0.032% |
| 1989 | 541 / #450 / 0.029% |
| 1988 | 487 / #463 / 0.027% |
| 1987 | 433 / #499 / 0.025% |
| 1986 | 486 / #444 / 0.028% |
| 1985 | 467 / #459 / 0.027% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 472 / #440 / 0.028% |
| 1983 | 389 / #499 / 0.023% |
| 1982 | 471 / #451 / 0.028% |
| 1981 | 489 / #436 / 0.029% |
| 1980 | 504 / #428 / 0.030% |
| 1979 | 492 / #425 / 0.031% |
| 1978 | 449 / #443 / 0.029% |
| 1977 | 374 / #500 / 0.024% |
| 1976 | 430 / #451 / 0.029% |
| 1975 | 414 / #456 / 0.028% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 391 / #460 / 0.027% |
| 1973 | 513 / #395 / 0.035% |
| 1972 | 436 / #440 / 0.029% |
| 1971 | 539 / #399 / 0.032% |
| 1970 | 645 / #371 / 0.037% |
| 1969 | 604 / #380 / 0.036% |
| 1968 | 585 / #376 / 0.036% |
| 1967 | 435 / #456 / 0.026% |
| 1966 | 435 / #449 / 0.026% |
| 1965 | 509 / #414 / 0.029% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 535 / #424 / 0.028% |
| 1963 | 556 / #407 / 0.029% |
| 1962 | 660 / #365 / 0.034% |
| 1961 | 710 / #359 / 0.035% |
| 1960 | 777 / #338 / 0.038% |
| 1959 | 769 / #342 / 0.038% |
| 1958 | 796 / #332 / 0.040% |
| 1957 | 901 / #306 / 0.044% |
| 1956 | 977 / #278 / 0.049% |
| 1955 | 888 / #291 / 0.045% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 819 / #295 / 0.042% |
| 1953 | 922 / #269 / 0.049% |
| 1952 | 920 / #262 / 0.050% |
| 1951 | 893 / #258 / 0.050% |
| 1950 | 986 / #239 / 0.058% |
| 1949 | 920 / #249 / 0.054% |
| 1948 | 935 / #245 / 0.055% |
| 1947 | 865 / #252 / 0.049% |
| 1946 | 797 / #253 / 0.051% |
| 1945 | 645 / #269 / 0.049% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 717 / #254 / 0.054% |
| 1943 | 711 / #260 / 0.051% |
| 1942 | 774 / #245 / 0.057% |
| 1941 | 700 / #246 / 0.058% |
| 1940 | 750 / #221 / 0.066% |
| 1939 | 749 / #223 / 0.068% |
| 1938 | 731 / #228 / 0.066% |
| 1937 | 779 / #215 / 0.073% |
| 1936 | 788 / #211 / 0.076% |
| 1935 | 817 / #209 / 0.078% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 823 / #216 / 0.079% |
| 1933 | 765 / #219 / 0.076% |
| 1932 | 850 / #212 / 0.080% |
| 1931 | 895 / #204 / 0.084% |
| 1930 | 938 / #203 / 0.083% |
| 1929 | 981 / #196 / 0.088% |
| 1928 | 1,010 / #200 / 0.088% |
| 1927 | 1,021 / #198 / 0.086% |
| 1926 | 965 / #199 / 0.081% |
| 1925 | 947 / #208 / 0.078% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 887 / #219 / 0.071% |
| 1923 | 875 / #218 / 0.073% |
| 1922 | 653 / #255 / 0.054% |
| 1921 | 700 / #252 / 0.057% |
| 1920 | 633 / #262 / 0.053% |
| 1919 | 677 / #245 / 0.060% |
| 1918 | 655 / #252 / 0.057% |
| 1917 | 617 / #251 / 0.057% |
| 1916 | 577 / #253 / 0.055% |
| 1915 | 563 / #251 / 0.057% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 425 / #253 / 0.056% |
| 1913 | 310 / #264 / 0.050% |
| 1912 | 220 / #309 / 0.039% |
| 1911 | 173 / #301 / 0.041% |
| 1910 | 143 / #319 / 0.036% |
| 1909 | 138 / #311 / 0.040% |
| 1908 | 131 / #310 / 0.039% |
| 1907 | 136 / #301 / 0.043% |
| 1906 | 123 / #303 / 0.042% |
| 1905 | 100 / #339 / 0.034% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 84 / #358 / 0.031% |
| 1903 | 65 / #395 / 0.025% |
| 1902 | 52 / #431 / 0.020% |
| 1901 | 46 / #436 / 0.019% |
| 1900 | 62 / #426 / 0.021% |
| 1899 | 44 / #441 / 0.019% |
| 1898 | 52 / #429 / 0.020% |
| 1897 | 56 / #388 / 0.024% |
| 1896 | 49 / #412 / 0.021% |
| 1895 | 44 / #431 / 0.019% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 28 / #550 / 0.013% |
| 1893 | 28 / #524 / 0.013% |
| 1892 | 29 / #507 / 0.014% |
| 1891 | 25 / #516 / 0.013% |
| 1890 | 19 / #609 / 0.010% |
| 1889 | 20 / #581 / 0.011% |
| 1888 | 17 / #619 / 0.010% |
| 1887 | 10 / #763 / 0.007% |
| 1886 | 12 / #678 / 0.008% |
| 1885 | 15 / #563 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 14 / #570 / 0.011% |
| 1883 | 7 / #783 / 0.006% |
| 1882 | 5 / #963 / 0.005% |
| 1881 | 8 / #649 / 0.009% |
| 1880 | 11 / #531 / 0.012% |