Total babies named Jim (all years): 153,899
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 / #4475 / 0.001% |
| 2023 | 26 / #4161 / 0.002% |
| 2022 | 34 / #3437 / 0.002% |
| 2021 | 37 / #3208 / 0.002% |
| 2020 | 40 / #2952 / 0.002% |
| 2019 | 39 / #3075 / 0.002% |
| 2018 | 39 / #3020 / 0.002% |
| 2017 | 37 / #3157 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 43 / #2811 / 0.002% |
| 2015 | 42 / #2829 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 63 / #2164 / 0.003% |
| 2013 | 60 / #2188 / 0.003% |
| 2012 | 58 / #2250 / 0.003% |
| 2011 | 61 / #2157 / 0.003% |
| 2010 | 64 / #2106 / 0.003% |
| 2009 | 61 / #2192 / 0.003% |
| 2008 | 88 / #1727 / 0.004% |
| 2007 | 79 / #1837 / 0.004% |
| 2006 | 97 / #1542 / 0.005% |
| 2005 | 92 / #1540 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 102 / #1400 / 0.005% |
| 2003 | 101 / #1351 / 0.005% |
| 2002 | 117 / #1197 / 0.006% |
| 2001 | 105 / #1271 / 0.005% |
| 2000 | 120 / #1157 / 0.006% |
| 1999 | 104 / #1219 / 0.005% |
| 1998 | 123 / #1069 / 0.006% |
| 1997 | 129 / #998 / 0.007% |
| 1996 | 157 / #875 / 0.008% |
| 1995 | 158 / #861 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 171 / #808 / 0.009% |
| 1993 | 167 / #820 / 0.009% |
| 1992 | 195 / #741 / 0.010% |
| 1991 | 184 / #753 / 0.009% |
| 1990 | 219 / #685 / 0.011% |
| 1989 | 193 / #709 / 0.010% |
| 1988 | 215 / #646 / 0.011% |
| 1987 | 241 / #583 / 0.013% |
| 1986 | 222 / #597 / 0.012% |
| 1985 | 207 / #608 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 256 / #541 / 0.014% |
| 1983 | 279 / #502 / 0.016% |
| 1982 | 313 / #483 / 0.017% |
| 1981 | 320 / #465 / 0.018% |
| 1980 | 302 / #486 / 0.017% |
| 1979 | 369 / #415 / 0.021% |
| 1978 | 359 / #410 / 0.022% |
| 1977 | 408 / #391 / 0.025% |
| 1976 | 420 / #373 / 0.027% |
| 1975 | 441 / #372 / 0.028% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 541 / #326 / 0.034% |
| 1973 | 585 / #302 / 0.038% |
| 1972 | 707 / #274 / 0.044% |
| 1971 | 934 / #245 / 0.053% |
| 1970 | 1,259 / #204 / 0.068% |
| 1969 | 1,427 / #190 / 0.080% |
| 1968 | 1,502 / #177 / 0.086% |
| 1967 | 1,806 / #151 / 0.104% |
| 1966 | 2,197 / #136 / 0.123% |
| 1965 | 2,772 / #117 / 0.149% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 3,645 / #101 / 0.183% |
| 1963 | 4,237 / #92 / 0.209% |
| 1962 | 4,712 / #85 / 0.228% |
| 1961 | 5,351 / #78 / 0.252% |
| 1960 | 5,549 / #75 / 0.260% |
| 1959 | 5,687 / #70 / 0.266% |
| 1958 | 4,922 / #87 / 0.232% |
| 1957 | 3,543 / #106 / 0.164% |
| 1956 | 2,188 / #148 / 0.103% |
| 1955 | 1,699 / #167 / 0.082% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,593 / #174 / 0.078% |
| 1953 | 1,535 / #173 / 0.078% |
| 1952 | 1,523 / #172 / 0.078% |
| 1951 | 1,595 / #164 / 0.085% |
| 1950 | 1,930 / #139 / 0.108% |
| 1949 | 2,725 / #108 / 0.154% |
| 1948 | 3,808 / #86 / 0.217% |
| 1947 | 4,640 / #77 / 0.254% |
| 1946 | 4,337 / #73 / 0.267% |
| 1945 | 3,624 / #68 / 0.269% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 3,744 / #68 / 0.275% |
| 1943 | 3,682 / #75 / 0.258% |
| 1942 | 3,514 / #74 / 0.254% |
| 1941 | 2,843 / #80 / 0.231% |
| 1940 | 2,715 / #78 / 0.234% |
| 1939 | 2,636 / #75 / 0.238% |
| 1938 | 2,497 / #81 / 0.225% |
| 1937 | 2,347 / #82 / 0.220% |
| 1936 | 2,268 / #85 / 0.219% |
| 1935 | 2,244 / #90 / 0.215% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 2,207 / #90 / 0.214% |
| 1933 | 1,875 / #98 / 0.189% |
| 1932 | 1,765 / #104 / 0.169% |
| 1931 | 1,520 / #116 / 0.146% |
| 1930 | 1,464 / #125 / 0.133% |
| 1929 | 1,290 / #132 / 0.120% |
| 1928 | 1,237 / #137 / 0.112% |
| 1927 | 1,293 / #136 / 0.115% |
| 1926 | 1,165 / #143 / 0.105% |
| 1925 | 1,124 / #147 / 0.101% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 992 / #160 / 0.088% |
| 1923 | 867 / #167 / 0.079% |
| 1922 | 881 / #169 / 0.081% |
| 1921 | 879 / #165 / 0.080% |
| 1920 | 838 / #165 / 0.079% |
| 1919 | 848 / #158 / 0.087% |
| 1918 | 827 / #165 / 0.082% |
| 1917 | 774 / #163 / 0.084% |
| 1916 | 684 / #177 / 0.077% |
| 1915 | 668 / #170 / 0.079% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 513 / #174 / 0.078% |
| 1913 | 473 / #154 / 0.092% |
| 1912 | 401 / #149 / 0.093% |
| 1911 | 245 / #134 / 0.108% |
| 1910 | 331 / #100 / 0.170% |
| 1909 | 259 / #105 / 0.158% |
| 1908 | 220 / #117 / 0.143% |
| 1907 | 281 / #90 / 0.191% |
| 1906 | 261 / #90 / 0.196% |
| 1905 | 236 / #95 / 0.178% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 266 / #85 / 0.208% |
| 1903 | 257 / #84 / 0.216% |
| 1902 | 300 / #77 / 0.245% |
| 1901 | 239 / #81 / 0.224% |
| 1900 | 399 / #68 / 0.265% |
| 1899 | 261 / #71 / 0.246% |
| 1898 | 269 / #77 / 0.219% |
| 1897 | 252 / #75 / 0.223% |
| 1896 | 281 / #71 / 0.235% |
| 1895 | 278 / #71 / 0.237% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 287 / #70 / 0.248% |
| 1893 | 255 / #74 / 0.227% |
| 1892 | 334 / #64 / 0.274% |
| 1891 | 288 / #63 / 0.285% |
| 1890 | 336 / #62 / 0.303% |
| 1889 | 328 / #58 / 0.297% |
| 1888 | 362 / #56 / 0.300% |
| 1887 | 339 / #50 / 0.334% |
| 1886 | 389 / #49 / 0.351% |
| 1885 | 370 / #46 / 0.343% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 346 / #55 / 0.302% |
| 1883 | 322 / #52 / 0.308% |
| 1882 | 396 / #45 / 0.348% |
| 1881 | 323 / #47 / 0.321% |
| 1880 | 345 / #49 / 0.312% |