Total babies named Joesph (all years): 15,649
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 14 / #6291 / 0.001% |
| 2023 | 17 / #5555 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 15 / #5990 / 0.001% |
| 2021 | 18 / #5225 / 0.001% |
| 2020 | 24 / #4207 / 0.001% |
| 2019 | 15 / #5949 / 0.001% |
| 2018 | 18 / #5193 / 0.001% |
| 2017 | 19 / #5014 / 0.001% |
| 2016 | 28 / #3830 / 0.001% |
| 2015 | 26 / #4025 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 36 / #3127 / 0.002% |
| 2013 | 38 / #2976 / 0.002% |
| 2012 | 56 / #2310 / 0.003% |
| 2011 | 46 / #2649 / 0.002% |
| 2010 | 64 / #2107 / 0.003% |
| 2009 | 73 / #1945 / 0.004% |
| 2008 | 61 / #2196 / 0.003% |
| 2007 | 75 / #1904 / 0.004% |
| 2006 | 84 / #1691 / 0.004% |
| 2005 | 86 / #1599 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 75 / #1709 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 70 / #1741 / 0.004% |
| 2002 | 70 / #1689 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 82 / #1489 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 79 / #1529 / 0.004% |
| 1999 | 88 / #1359 / 0.005% |
| 1998 | 83 / #1396 / 0.004% |
| 1997 | 76 / #1431 / 0.004% |
| 1996 | 81 / #1342 / 0.004% |
| 1995 | 98 / #1165 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 80 / #1307 / 0.004% |
| 1993 | 89 / #1190 / 0.005% |
| 1992 | 93 / #1142 / 0.005% |
| 1991 | 101 / #1087 / 0.005% |
| 1990 | 96 / #1091 / 0.005% |
| 1989 | 125 / #909 / 0.006% |
| 1988 | 169 / #725 / 0.009% |
| 1987 | 161 / #722 / 0.009% |
| 1986 | 170 / #698 / 0.009% |
| 1985 | 200 / #620 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 219 / #573 / 0.012% |
| 1983 | 212 / #581 / 0.012% |
| 1982 | 250 / #545 / 0.014% |
| 1981 | 256 / #527 / 0.014% |
| 1980 | 250 / #544 / 0.014% |
| 1979 | 254 / #532 / 0.015% |
| 1978 | 256 / #510 / 0.016% |
| 1977 | 261 / #507 / 0.016% |
| 1976 | 248 / #510 / 0.016% |
| 1975 | 246 / #512 / 0.016% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 217 / #545 / 0.014% |
| 1973 | 206 / #548 / 0.013% |
| 1972 | 211 / #549 / 0.013% |
| 1971 | 211 / #558 / 0.012% |
| 1970 | 227 / #537 / 0.012% |
| 1969 | 179 / #582 / 0.010% |
| 1968 | 184 / #560 / 0.011% |
| 1967 | 181 / #557 / 0.010% |
| 1966 | 213 / #521 / 0.012% |
| 1965 | 220 / #515 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 266 / #483 / 0.013% |
| 1963 | 272 / #485 / 0.013% |
| 1962 | 257 / #495 / 0.012% |
| 1961 | 278 / #479 / 0.013% |
| 1960 | 263 / #489 / 0.012% |
| 1959 | 249 / #497 / 0.012% |
| 1958 | 281 / #474 / 0.013% |
| 1957 | 320 / #435 / 0.015% |
| 1956 | 262 / #465 / 0.012% |
| 1955 | 305 / #419 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 279 / #434 / 0.014% |
| 1953 | 247 / #456 / 0.013% |
| 1952 | 212 / #482 / 0.011% |
| 1951 | 201 / #478 / 0.011% |
| 1950 | 191 / #488 / 0.011% |
| 1949 | 177 / #499 / 0.010% |
| 1948 | 166 / #511 / 0.009% |
| 1947 | 177 / #505 / 0.010% |
| 1946 | 128 / #567 / 0.008% |
| 1945 | 102 / #600 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 120 / #554 / 0.009% |
| 1943 | 127 / #562 / 0.009% |
| 1942 | 110 / #600 / 0.008% |
| 1941 | 114 / #565 / 0.009% |
| 1940 | 106 / #578 / 0.009% |
| 1939 | 99 / #578 / 0.009% |
| 1938 | 80 / #676 / 0.007% |
| 1937 | 88 / #620 / 0.008% |
| 1936 | 86 / #629 / 0.008% |
| 1935 | 90 / #620 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 84 / #660 / 0.008% |
| 1933 | 79 / #660 / 0.008% |
| 1932 | 96 / #602 / 0.009% |
| 1931 | 101 / #582 / 0.010% |
| 1930 | 104 / #597 / 0.009% |
| 1929 | 121 / #532 / 0.011% |
| 1928 | 127 / #542 / 0.011% |
| 1927 | 131 / #538 / 0.012% |
| 1926 | 134 / #522 / 0.012% |
| 1925 | 122 / #560 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 126 / #564 / 0.011% |
| 1923 | 125 / #555 / 0.011% |
| 1922 | 121 / #585 / 0.011% |
| 1921 | 115 / #593 / 0.010% |
| 1920 | 115 / #581 / 0.011% |
| 1919 | 104 / #590 / 0.011% |
| 1918 | 117 / #559 / 0.012% |
| 1917 | 105 / #577 / 0.011% |
| 1916 | 94 / #602 / 0.011% |
| 1915 | 85 / #631 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 77 / #572 / 0.012% |
| 1913 | 56 / #589 / 0.011% |
| 1912 | 34 / #744 / 0.008% |
| 1911 | 19 / #741 / 0.008% |
| 1910 | 17 / #741 / 0.009% |
| 1909 | 10 / #984 / 0.006% |
| 1907 | 10 / #903 / 0.007% |
| 1906 | 11 / #785 / 0.008% |
| 1904 | 10 / #784 / 0.008% |
| 1903 | 8 / #878 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1902 | 7 / #979 / 0.006% |
| 1901 | 6 / #999 / 0.006% |
| 1900 | 18 / #593 / 0.012% |
| 1899 | 8 / #824 / 0.008% |
| 1898 | 7 / #940 / 0.006% |
| 1896 | 5 / #1179 / 0.004% |
| 1895 | 9 / #767 / 0.008% |
| 1893 | 6 / #970 / 0.005% |
| 1892 | 11 / #661 / 0.009% |
| 1891 | 5 / #1043 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1890 | 5 / #1079 / 0.005% |
| 1889 | 6 / #929 / 0.005% |
| 1888 | 5 / #1110 / 0.004% |
| 1887 | 6 / #874 / 0.006% |
| 1884 | 10 / #638 / 0.009% |
| 1882 | 7 / #799 / 0.006% |
| 1881 | 5 / #942 / 0.005% |