Total babies named Lou (all years): 38,049
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 70 / #2541 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 69 / #2570 / 0.004% |
| 2022 | 62 / #2772 / 0.004% |
| 2021 | 54 / #3052 / 0.003% |
| 2020 | 43 / #3527 / 0.003% |
| 2019 | 40 / #3757 / 0.002% |
| 2018 | 39 / #3822 / 0.002% |
| 2017 | 30 / #4649 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 35 / #4207 / 0.002% |
| 2015 | 29 / #4807 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 22 / #5909 / 0.001% |
| 2013 | 15 / #8014 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 18 / #7043 / 0.001% |
| 2011 | 16 / #7654 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 11 / #10201 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 5 / #19029 / 0.000% |
| 2008 | 6 / #16658 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | 6 / #16741 / 0.000% |
| 2006 | 9 / #12017 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 14 / #8157 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 10 / #10379 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 10 / #10121 / 0.001% |
| 2002 | 8 / #11742 / 0.000% |
| 2001 | 8 / #11606 / 0.000% |
| 2000 | 9 / #10390 / 0.001% |
| 1999 | 6 / #13684 / 0.000% |
| 1998 | 8 / #10713 / 0.000% |
| 1997 | 7 / #11548 / 0.000% |
| 1996 | — |
| 1995 | — |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 7 / #11264 / 0.000% |
| 1993 | 10 / #8434 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 9 / #9190 / 0.000% |
| 1991 | 6 / #12432 / 0.000% |
| 1990 | 12 / #7138 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 13 / #6378 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 11 / #6919 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 13 / #5795 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 13 / #5625 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 12 / #5886 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 19 / #4095 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 18 / #4206 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 29 / #3061 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 30 / #2954 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 19 / #4080 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 40 / #2366 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 38 / #2373 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 43 / #2177 / 0.003% |
| 1976 | 48 / #1896 / 0.003% |
| 1975 | 49 / #1864 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 64 / #1527 / 0.004% |
| 1973 | 91 / #1189 / 0.006% |
| 1972 | 101 / #1108 / 0.007% |
| 1971 | 134 / #955 / 0.008% |
| 1970 | 159 / #849 / 0.009% |
| 1969 | 165 / #803 / 0.010% |
| 1968 | 169 / #770 / 0.010% |
| 1967 | 171 / #754 / 0.010% |
| 1966 | 186 / #725 / 0.011% |
| 1965 | 225 / #656 / 0.013% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 277 / #599 / 0.015% |
| 1963 | 382 / #496 / 0.020% |
| 1962 | 396 / #487 / 0.020% |
| 1961 | 473 / #447 / 0.023% |
| 1960 | 593 / #388 / 0.029% |
| 1959 | 706 / #358 / 0.035% |
| 1958 | 851 / #314 / 0.042% |
| 1957 | 884 / #309 / 0.043% |
| 1956 | 1,066 / #259 / 0.053% |
| 1955 | 1,225 / #232 / 0.063% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,495 / #204 / 0.077% |
| 1953 | 1,434 / #208 / 0.076% |
| 1952 | 569 / #345 / 0.031% |
| 1951 | 440 / #391 / 0.024% |
| 1950 | 414 / #395 / 0.024% |
| 1949 | 441 / #374 / 0.026% |
| 1948 | 439 / #379 / 0.026% |
| 1947 | 510 / #355 / 0.029% |
| 1946 | 478 / #343 / 0.030% |
| 1945 | 399 / #341 / 0.031% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 463 / #314 / 0.035% |
| 1943 | 456 / #330 / 0.033% |
| 1942 | 536 / #293 / 0.040% |
| 1941 | 506 / #286 / 0.042% |
| 1940 | 494 / #281 / 0.043% |
| 1939 | 502 / #277 / 0.046% |
| 1938 | 532 / #274 / 0.048% |
| 1937 | 539 / #269 / 0.051% |
| 1936 | 506 / #271 / 0.049% |
| 1935 | 522 / #269 / 0.050% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 559 / #263 / 0.054% |
| 1933 | 534 / #265 / 0.053% |
| 1932 | 540 / #270 / 0.051% |
| 1931 | 463 / #290 / 0.043% |
| 1930 | 468 / #306 / 0.042% |
| 1929 | 474 / #309 / 0.042% |
| 1928 | 425 / #320 / 0.037% |
| 1927 | 489 / #304 / 0.041% |
| 1926 | 417 / #323 / 0.035% |
| 1925 | 395 / #338 / 0.032% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 381 / #349 / 0.031% |
| 1923 | 343 / #358 / 0.028% |
| 1922 | 350 / #349 / 0.029% |
| 1921 | 320 / #377 / 0.026% |
| 1920 | 336 / #357 / 0.028% |
| 1919 | 313 / #361 / 0.028% |
| 1918 | 371 / #335 / 0.032% |
| 1917 | 338 / #338 / 0.031% |
| 1916 | 308 / #351 / 0.029% |
| 1915 | 285 / #354 / 0.029% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 227 / #348 / 0.030% |
| 1913 | 199 / #342 / 0.032% |
| 1912 | 212 / #315 / 0.038% |
| 1911 | 153 / #317 / 0.037% |
| 1910 | 144 / #318 / 0.036% |
| 1909 | 140 / #307 / 0.040% |
| 1908 | 147 / #293 / 0.044% |
| 1907 | 124 / #313 / 0.039% |
| 1906 | 100 / #334 / 0.034% |
| 1905 | 143 / #276 / 0.049% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 117 / #297 / 0.042% |
| 1903 | 133 / #266 / 0.051% |
| 1902 | 121 / #286 / 0.046% |
| 1901 | 96 / #304 / 0.040% |
| 1900 | 140 / #275 / 0.047% |
| 1899 | 125 / #253 / 0.054% |
| 1898 | 156 / #236 / 0.060% |
| 1897 | 114 / #267 / 0.049% |
| 1896 | 130 / #247 / 0.055% |
| 1895 | 125 / #253 / 0.054% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 118 / #253 / 0.053% |
| 1893 | 137 / #223 / 0.064% |
| 1892 | 137 / #222 / 0.065% |
| 1891 | 109 / #231 / 0.059% |
| 1890 | 132 / #210 / 0.069% |
| 1889 | 120 / #210 / 0.067% |
| 1888 | 169 / #173 / 0.095% |
| 1887 | 147 / #167 / 0.101% |
| 1886 | 129 / #178 / 0.089% |
| 1885 | 135 / #158 / 0.101% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 146 / #145 / 0.113% |
| 1883 | 142 / #136 / 0.126% |
| 1882 | 131 / #137 / 0.121% |
| 1881 | 114 / #138 / 0.124% |
| 1880 | 131 / #125 / 0.144% |