Total babies named Loyd (all years): 22,517
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 7 / #10475 / 0.000% |
| 2023 | 6 / #11692 / 0.000% |
| 2021 | 7 / #10363 / 0.000% |
| 2019 | 10 / #7982 / 0.001% |
| 2018 | 5 / #13378 / 0.000% |
| 2017 | 8 / #9373 / 0.000% |
| 2016 | 5 / #13430 / 0.000% |
| 2015 | 7 / #10209 / 0.000% |
| 2014 | 5 / #13278 / 0.000% |
| 2013 | 7 / #10316 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 8 / #9382 / 0.000% |
| 2011 | 6 / #11719 / 0.000% |
| 2010 | 9 / #8536 / 0.000% |
| 2009 | 8 / #9539 / 0.000% |
| 2008 | 9 / #8742 / 0.000% |
| 2006 | 6 / #11504 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 10 / #7454 / 0.001% |
| 2004 | 5 / #12480 / 0.000% |
| 2003 | 7 / #9254 / 0.000% |
| 2002 | 9 / #7419 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2001 | 12 / #5892 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 10 / #6642 / 0.001% |
| 1999 | 15 / #4678 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 14 / #4791 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 10 / #5920 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 20 / #3494 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 14 / #4422 / 0.001% |
| 1994 | 19 / #3542 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 23 / #2991 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 23 / #2962 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1991 | 23 / #2885 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 21 / #3019 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 35 / #2050 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 38 / #1808 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 23 / #2434 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 37 / #1713 / 0.002% |
| 1985 | 29 / #1999 / 0.002% |
| 1984 | 37 / #1619 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 33 / #1736 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 50 / #1331 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1981 | 57 / #1216 / 0.003% |
| 1980 | 62 / #1160 / 0.003% |
| 1979 | 32 / #1773 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 46 / #1366 / 0.003% |
| 1977 | 48 / #1305 / 0.003% |
| 1976 | 59 / #1106 / 0.004% |
| 1975 | 68 / #997 / 0.004% |
| 1974 | 55 / #1111 / 0.004% |
| 1973 | 60 / #1051 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 70 / #973 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1971 | 110 / #777 / 0.006% |
| 1970 | 105 / #797 / 0.006% |
| 1969 | 84 / #840 / 0.005% |
| 1968 | 91 / #778 / 0.005% |
| 1967 | 104 / #728 / 0.006% |
| 1966 | 90 / #768 / 0.005% |
| 1965 | 107 / #720 / 0.006% |
| 1964 | 111 / #733 / 0.006% |
| 1963 | 156 / #625 / 0.008% |
| 1962 | 146 / #642 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1961 | 176 / #596 / 0.008% |
| 1960 | 147 / #644 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 185 / #577 / 0.009% |
| 1958 | 171 / #592 / 0.008% |
| 1957 | 190 / #559 / 0.009% |
| 1956 | 198 / #531 / 0.009% |
| 1955 | 211 / #507 / 0.010% |
| 1954 | 192 / #527 / 0.009% |
| 1953 | 232 / #464 / 0.012% |
| 1952 | 247 / #450 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1951 | 231 / #445 / 0.012% |
| 1950 | 255 / #420 / 0.014% |
| 1949 | 236 / #435 / 0.013% |
| 1948 | 268 / #412 / 0.015% |
| 1947 | 313 / #386 / 0.017% |
| 1946 | 326 / #362 / 0.020% |
| 1945 | 236 / #389 / 0.018% |
| 1944 | 289 / #352 / 0.021% |
| 1943 | 316 / #347 / 0.022% |
| 1942 | 343 / #326 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1941 | 334 / #322 / 0.027% |
| 1940 | 331 / #309 / 0.029% |
| 1939 | 366 / #289 / 0.033% |
| 1938 | 355 / #290 / 0.032% |
| 1937 | 372 / #283 / 0.035% |
| 1936 | 356 / #286 / 0.034% |
| 1935 | 383 / #278 / 0.037% |
| 1934 | 363 / #283 / 0.035% |
| 1933 | 407 / #263 / 0.041% |
| 1932 | 448 / #255 / 0.043% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1931 | 515 / #229 / 0.050% |
| 1930 | 499 / #253 / 0.045% |
| 1929 | 506 / #241 / 0.047% |
| 1928 | 540 / #240 / 0.049% |
| 1927 | 599 / #225 / 0.053% |
| 1926 | 623 / #219 / 0.056% |
| 1925 | 554 / #237 / 0.050% |
| 1924 | 605 / #223 / 0.053% |
| 1923 | 606 / #212 / 0.055% |
| 1922 | 582 / #229 / 0.053% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1921 | 600 / #222 / 0.054% |
| 1920 | 582 / #222 / 0.055% |
| 1919 | 604 / #207 / 0.062% |
| 1918 | 567 / #218 / 0.056% |
| 1917 | 488 / #225 / 0.053% |
| 1916 | 467 / #228 / 0.052% |
| 1915 | 436 / #228 / 0.051% |
| 1914 | 312 / #242 / 0.048% |
| 1913 | 235 / #248 / 0.046% |
| 1912 | 196 / #254 / 0.046% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1911 | 137 / #216 / 0.061% |
| 1910 | 99 / #237 / 0.051% |
| 1909 | 79 / #249 / 0.048% |
| 1908 | 61 / #275 / 0.040% |
| 1907 | 68 / #255 / 0.046% |
| 1906 | 70 / #234 / 0.053% |
| 1905 | 53 / #270 / 0.040% |
| 1904 | 57 / #254 / 0.044% |
| 1903 | 70 / #214 / 0.059% |
| 1902 | 61 / #233 / 0.050% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1901 | 60 / #225 / 0.056% |
| 1900 | 64 / #255 / 0.043% |
| 1899 | 46 / #248 / 0.043% |
| 1898 | 55 / #238 / 0.045% |
| 1897 | 61 / #214 / 0.054% |
| 1896 | 56 / #244 / 0.047% |
| 1895 | 55 / #241 / 0.047% |
| 1894 | 36 / #294 / 0.031% |
| 1893 | 49 / #253 / 0.044% |
| 1892 | 41 / #286 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1891 | 29 / #315 / 0.029% |
| 1890 | 32 / #307 / 0.029% |
| 1889 | 31 / #317 / 0.028% |
| 1888 | 28 / #350 / 0.023% |
| 1887 | 20 / #373 / 0.020% |
| 1886 | 21 / #392 / 0.019% |
| 1885 | 24 / #361 / 0.022% |
| 1884 | 30 / #322 / 0.026% |
| 1883 | 13 / #507 / 0.012% |
| 1882 | 16 / #462 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1881 | 11 / #549 / 0.011% |
| 1880 | 14 / #493 / 0.013% |