Total babies named Lucretia (all years): 10,422
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 7 / #13272 / 0.000% |
| 2017 | 6 / #15206 / 0.000% |
| 2016 | 5 / #17805 / 0.000% |
| 2012 | 8 / #12935 / 0.000% |
| 2011 | 6 / #15991 / 0.000% |
| 2010 | 8 / #12985 / 0.000% |
| 2009 | 6 / #16430 / 0.000% |
| 2008 | 6 / #16659 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | 9 / #12255 / 0.000% |
| 2006 | 5 / #18896 / 0.000% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 6 / #15293 / 0.000% |
| 2003 | 6 / #14991 / 0.000% |
| 2002 | 12 / #8611 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 7 / #12891 / 0.000% |
| 2000 | 13 / #7841 / 0.001% |
| 1999 | 13 / #7508 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 21 / #5057 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 22 / #4755 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 20 / #4978 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 25 / #4171 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 35 / #3277 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 41 / #2916 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 53 / #2445 / 0.003% |
| 1991 | 65 / #2085 / 0.003% |
| 1990 | 70 / #1965 / 0.004% |
| 1989 | 68 / #1919 / 0.004% |
| 1988 | 72 / #1762 / 0.004% |
| 1987 | 66 / #1784 / 0.004% |
| 1986 | 76 / #1581 / 0.004% |
| 1985 | 73 / #1627 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 67 / #1649 / 0.004% |
| 1983 | 85 / #1397 / 0.005% |
| 1982 | 117 / #1174 / 0.007% |
| 1981 | 114 / #1168 / 0.007% |
| 1980 | 104 / #1256 / 0.006% |
| 1979 | 110 / #1194 / 0.007% |
| 1978 | 125 / #1064 / 0.008% |
| 1977 | 142 / #975 / 0.009% |
| 1976 | 144 / #912 / 0.010% |
| 1975 | 145 / #904 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 190 / #747 / 0.013% |
| 1973 | 173 / #777 / 0.012% |
| 1972 | 173 / #794 / 0.011% |
| 1971 | 189 / #770 / 0.011% |
| 1970 | 177 / #792 / 0.010% |
| 1969 | 136 / #909 / 0.008% |
| 1968 | 133 / #895 / 0.008% |
| 1967 | 114 / #955 / 0.007% |
| 1966 | 161 / #775 / 0.010% |
| 1965 | 150 / #812 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 172 / #794 / 0.009% |
| 1963 | 161 / #822 / 0.008% |
| 1962 | 168 / #808 / 0.009% |
| 1961 | 178 / #787 / 0.009% |
| 1960 | 179 / #763 / 0.009% |
| 1959 | 133 / #906 / 0.007% |
| 1958 | 121 / #939 / 0.006% |
| 1957 | 129 / #899 / 0.006% |
| 1956 | 143 / #828 / 0.007% |
| 1955 | 141 / #817 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 143 / #784 / 0.007% |
| 1953 | 136 / #790 / 0.007% |
| 1952 | 110 / #880 / 0.006% |
| 1951 | 121 / #813 / 0.007% |
| 1950 | 134 / #744 / 0.008% |
| 1949 | 113 / #828 / 0.007% |
| 1948 | 125 / #765 / 0.007% |
| 1947 | 118 / #807 / 0.007% |
| 1946 | 126 / #720 / 0.008% |
| 1945 | 96 / #765 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 119 / #688 / 0.009% |
| 1943 | 128 / #670 / 0.009% |
| 1942 | 152 / #603 / 0.011% |
| 1941 | 165 / #548 / 0.014% |
| 1940 | 146 / #579 / 0.013% |
| 1939 | 108 / #653 / 0.010% |
| 1938 | 88 / #733 / 0.008% |
| 1937 | 88 / #721 / 0.008% |
| 1936 | 92 / #697 / 0.009% |
| 1935 | 81 / #755 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 66 / #843 / 0.006% |
| 1933 | 71 / #786 / 0.007% |
| 1932 | 104 / #662 / 0.010% |
| 1931 | 75 / #781 / 0.007% |
| 1930 | 68 / #876 / 0.006% |
| 1929 | 72 / #838 / 0.006% |
| 1928 | 87 / #771 / 0.008% |
| 1927 | 105 / #707 / 0.009% |
| 1926 | 107 / #700 / 0.009% |
| 1925 | 79 / #838 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 92 / #780 / 0.007% |
| 1923 | 75 / #849 / 0.006% |
| 1922 | 87 / #781 / 0.007% |
| 1921 | 97 / #746 / 0.008% |
| 1920 | 101 / #723 / 0.008% |
| 1919 | 76 / #809 / 0.007% |
| 1918 | 92 / #746 / 0.008% |
| 1917 | 78 / #786 / 0.007% |
| 1916 | 89 / #724 / 0.009% |
| 1915 | 92 / #690 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 61 / #740 / 0.008% |
| 1913 | 49 / #756 / 0.008% |
| 1912 | 51 / #708 / 0.009% |
| 1911 | 40 / #692 / 0.010% |
| 1910 | 29 / #807 / 0.007% |
| 1909 | 37 / #656 / 0.011% |
| 1908 | 35 / #660 / 0.010% |
| 1907 | 30 / #697 / 0.009% |
| 1906 | 30 / #672 / 0.010% |
| 1905 | 36 / #583 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 33 / #594 / 0.012% |
| 1903 | 32 / #585 / 0.012% |
| 1902 | 28 / #634 / 0.011% |
| 1901 | 30 / #570 / 0.013% |
| 1900 | 28 / #682 / 0.009% |
| 1899 | 29 / #575 / 0.012% |
| 1898 | 26 / #645 / 0.010% |
| 1897 | 30 / #548 / 0.013% |
| 1896 | 31 / #543 / 0.013% |
| 1895 | 29 / #557 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 31 / #521 / 0.014% |
| 1893 | 27 / #542 / 0.013% |
| 1892 | 32 / #485 / 0.015% |
| 1891 | 35 / #426 / 0.019% |
| 1890 | 32 / #463 / 0.017% |
| 1889 | 30 / #447 / 0.017% |
| 1888 | 35 / #424 / 0.020% |
| 1887 | 27 / #430 / 0.019% |
| 1886 | 32 / #382 / 0.022% |
| 1885 | 34 / #346 / 0.026% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 26 / #394 / 0.020% |
| 1883 | 35 / #297 / 0.031% |
| 1882 | 65 / #207 / 0.060% |
| 1881 | 52 / #211 / 0.057% |
| 1880 | 29 / #292 / 0.032% |