Total babies named Muriel (all years): 55,614
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 50 / #3198 / 0.003% |
| 2023 | 27 / #4954 / 0.002% |
| 2022 | 22 / #5750 / 0.001% |
| 2021 | 19 / #6329 / 0.001% |
| 2020 | 20 / #6011 / 0.001% |
| 2019 | 20 / #6116 / 0.001% |
| 2018 | 19 / #6434 / 0.001% |
| 2017 | 26 / #5142 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 21 / #6124 / 0.001% |
| 2015 | 28 / #4943 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 30 / #4735 / 0.002% |
| 2013 | 15 / #8045 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 16 / #7692 / 0.001% |
| 2011 | 21 / #6277 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 22 / #6117 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 20 / #6737 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 31 / #4842 / 0.002% |
| 2007 | 30 / #4904 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 33 / #4432 / 0.002% |
| 2005 | 27 / #4916 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 27 / #4905 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 30 / #4387 / 0.002% |
| 2002 | 38 / #3568 / 0.002% |
| 2001 | 30 / #4169 / 0.002% |
| 2000 | 32 / #3953 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 23 / #4826 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 41 / #3098 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 34 / #3421 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 45 / #2743 / 0.003% |
| 1995 | 37 / #3139 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 25 / #4209 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 42 / #2866 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 34 / #3325 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 42 / #2825 / 0.002% |
| 1990 | 37 / #3056 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 47 / #2468 / 0.003% |
| 1988 | 37 / #2845 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 48 / #2258 / 0.003% |
| 1986 | 59 / #1904 / 0.003% |
| 1985 | 38 / #2578 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 36 / #2606 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 40 / #2387 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 43 / #2313 / 0.003% |
| 1981 | 34 / #2701 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 51 / #2056 / 0.003% |
| 1979 | 30 / #2902 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 50 / #1952 / 0.003% |
| 1977 | 39 / #2326 / 0.003% |
| 1976 | 27 / #2839 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 55 / #1723 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 41 / #2050 / 0.003% |
| 1973 | 53 / #1699 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 46 / #1849 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 81 / #1331 / 0.005% |
| 1970 | 76 / #1381 / 0.004% |
| 1969 | 67 / #1433 / 0.004% |
| 1968 | 82 / #1204 / 0.005% |
| 1967 | 84 / #1163 / 0.005% |
| 1966 | 105 / #1008 / 0.006% |
| 1965 | 108 / #1006 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 141 / #875 / 0.007% |
| 1963 | 175 / #786 / 0.009% |
| 1962 | 163 / #822 / 0.008% |
| 1961 | 172 / #797 / 0.009% |
| 1960 | 168 / #792 / 0.008% |
| 1959 | 163 / #802 / 0.008% |
| 1958 | 169 / #772 / 0.008% |
| 1957 | 216 / #668 / 0.011% |
| 1956 | 219 / #644 / 0.011% |
| 1955 | 245 / #587 / 0.013% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 267 / #545 / 0.014% |
| 1953 | 309 / #496 / 0.016% |
| 1952 | 319 / #473 / 0.017% |
| 1951 | 334 / #454 / 0.019% |
| 1950 | 330 / #445 / 0.019% |
| 1949 | 402 / #397 / 0.024% |
| 1948 | 386 / #405 / 0.023% |
| 1947 | 448 / #378 / 0.025% |
| 1946 | 399 / #382 / 0.025% |
| 1945 | 390 / #349 / 0.030% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 472 / #310 / 0.036% |
| 1943 | 530 / #301 / 0.038% |
| 1942 | 517 / #303 / 0.038% |
| 1941 | 541 / #275 / 0.045% |
| 1940 | 581 / #258 / 0.051% |
| 1939 | 584 / #258 / 0.053% |
| 1938 | 706 / #234 / 0.064% |
| 1937 | 702 / #232 / 0.066% |
| 1936 | 698 / #235 / 0.067% |
| 1935 | 797 / #215 / 0.076% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 829 / #215 / 0.079% |
| 1933 | 872 / #198 / 0.087% |
| 1932 | 1,046 / #181 / 0.098% |
| 1931 | 1,081 / #172 / 0.102% |
| 1930 | 1,341 / #155 / 0.119% |
| 1929 | 1,463 / #149 / 0.131% |
| 1928 | 1,661 / #139 / 0.144% |
| 1927 | 1,807 / #138 / 0.152% |
| 1926 | 2,027 / #129 / 0.171% |
| 1925 | 2,215 / #126 / 0.182% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 2,237 / #126 / 0.179% |
| 1923 | 2,360 / #114 / 0.196% |
| 1922 | 2,392 / #112 / 0.199% |
| 1921 | 2,248 / #119 / 0.182% |
| 1920 | 2,071 / #123 / 0.173% |
| 1919 | 1,793 / #133 / 0.159% |
| 1918 | 1,797 / #130 / 0.155% |
| 1917 | 1,714 / #128 / 0.159% |
| 1916 | 1,524 / #134 / 0.146% |
| 1915 | 1,445 / #134 / 0.147% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 1,133 / #133 / 0.149% |
| 1913 | 882 / #137 / 0.141% |
| 1912 | 695 / #156 / 0.125% |
| 1911 | 353 / #203 / 0.084% |
| 1910 | 365 / #187 / 0.092% |
| 1909 | 311 / #191 / 0.090% |
| 1908 | 262 / #207 / 0.078% |
| 1907 | 219 / #223 / 0.069% |
| 1906 | 220 / #207 / 0.075% |
| 1905 | 186 / #230 / 0.064% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 214 / #206 / 0.078% |
| 1903 | 220 / #191 / 0.084% |
| 1902 | 206 / #205 / 0.078% |
| 1901 | 195 / #206 / 0.081% |
| 1900 | 224 / #211 / 0.075% |
| 1899 | 167 / #212 / 0.072% |
| 1898 | 129 / #268 / 0.050% |
| 1897 | 152 / #223 / 0.065% |
| 1896 | 144 / #232 / 0.061% |
| 1895 | 108 / #272 / 0.046% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 89 / #294 / 0.040% |
| 1893 | 87 / #290 / 0.041% |
| 1892 | 69 / #325 / 0.033% |
| 1891 | 59 / #329 / 0.032% |
| 1890 | 58 / #336 / 0.030% |
| 1889 | 53 / #343 / 0.030% |
| 1888 | 43 / #368 / 0.024% |
| 1887 | 29 / #408 / 0.020% |
| 1886 | 25 / #436 / 0.017% |
| 1885 | 26 / #410 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 21 / #445 / 0.016% |
| 1883 | 18 / #459 / 0.016% |
| 1882 | 15 / #486 / 0.014% |
| 1881 | 11 / #529 / 0.012% |
| 1880 | 7 / #719 / 0.008% |