Total babies named Raleigh (all years): 12,165
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 63 / #2273 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 69 / #2120 / 0.004% |
| 2022 | 65 / #2232 / 0.004% |
| 2021 | 63 / #2251 / 0.004% |
| 2020 | 81 / #1844 / 0.005% |
| 2019 | 99 / #1648 / 0.006% |
| 2018 | 93 / #1698 / 0.005% |
| 2017 | 79 / #1866 / 0.004% |
| 2016 | 89 / #1750 / 0.005% |
| 2015 | 78 / #1886 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 113 / #1454 / 0.006% |
| 2013 | 75 / #1893 / 0.004% |
| 2012 | 81 / #1830 / 0.004% |
| 2011 | 88 / #1697 / 0.005% |
| 2010 | 84 / #1774 / 0.004% |
| 2009 | 50 / #2549 / 0.003% |
| 2008 | 65 / #2116 / 0.003% |
| 2007 | 58 / #2272 / 0.003% |
| 2006 | 53 / #2371 / 0.003% |
| 2005 | 59 / #2105 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 59 / #2045 / 0.003% |
| 2003 | 56 / #2050 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 64 / #1810 / 0.003% |
| 2001 | 32 / #2913 / 0.002% |
| 2000 | 48 / #2123 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 47 / #2053 / 0.002% |
| 1998 | 47 / #2037 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 59 / #1690 / 0.003% |
| 1996 | 51 / #1811 / 0.003% |
| 1995 | 48 / #1828 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 58 / #1599 / 0.003% |
| 1993 | 52 / #1692 / 0.003% |
| 1992 | 70 / #1359 / 0.004% |
| 1991 | 58 / #1523 / 0.003% |
| 1990 | 48 / #1696 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 49 / #1635 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 52 / #1475 / 0.003% |
| 1987 | 68 / #1171 / 0.004% |
| 1986 | 44 / #1529 / 0.002% |
| 1985 | 52 / #1346 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 57 / #1221 / 0.003% |
| 1983 | 46 / #1392 / 0.003% |
| 1982 | 49 / #1356 / 0.003% |
| 1981 | 32 / #1801 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 48 / #1372 / 0.003% |
| 1979 | 43 / #1429 / 0.003% |
| 1978 | 39 / #1499 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 42 / #1423 / 0.003% |
| 1976 | 47 / #1301 / 0.003% |
| 1975 | 42 / #1357 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 34 / #1514 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 35 / #1452 / 0.002% |
| 1972 | 48 / #1189 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 55 / #1105 / 0.003% |
| 1970 | 59 / #1068 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 54 / #1060 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 55 / #1004 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 43 / #1146 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 51 / #1023 / 0.003% |
| 1965 | 70 / #879 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 51 / #1068 / 0.003% |
| 1963 | 50 / #1088 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 73 / #895 / 0.004% |
| 1961 | 71 / #911 / 0.003% |
| 1960 | 56 / #1029 / 0.003% |
| 1959 | 76 / #884 / 0.004% |
| 1958 | 91 / #785 / 0.004% |
| 1957 | 74 / #881 / 0.003% |
| 1956 | 82 / #829 / 0.004% |
| 1955 | 80 / #823 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 84 / #783 / 0.004% |
| 1953 | 87 / #763 / 0.004% |
| 1952 | 98 / #713 / 0.005% |
| 1951 | 92 / #726 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 96 / #703 / 0.005% |
| 1949 | 94 / #712 / 0.005% |
| 1948 | 100 / #676 / 0.006% |
| 1947 | 110 / #660 / 0.006% |
| 1946 | 100 / #647 / 0.006% |
| 1945 | 104 / #598 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 100 / #617 / 0.007% |
| 1943 | 108 / #610 / 0.008% |
| 1942 | 127 / #547 / 0.009% |
| 1941 | 93 / #634 / 0.008% |
| 1940 | 87 / #644 / 0.008% |
| 1939 | 95 / #600 / 0.009% |
| 1938 | 90 / #631 / 0.008% |
| 1937 | 84 / #649 / 0.008% |
| 1936 | 78 / #673 / 0.008% |
| 1935 | 95 / #596 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 107 / #572 / 0.010% |
| 1933 | 100 / #581 / 0.010% |
| 1932 | 80 / #688 / 0.008% |
| 1931 | 97 / #601 / 0.009% |
| 1930 | 90 / #651 / 0.008% |
| 1929 | 91 / #646 / 0.008% |
| 1928 | 93 / #651 / 0.008% |
| 1927 | 125 / #552 / 0.011% |
| 1926 | 101 / #626 / 0.009% |
| 1925 | 100 / #638 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 138 / #542 / 0.012% |
| 1923 | 113 / #595 / 0.010% |
| 1922 | 131 / #553 / 0.012% |
| 1921 | 139 / #530 / 0.013% |
| 1920 | 134 / #530 / 0.013% |
| 1919 | 97 / #617 / 0.010% |
| 1918 | 116 / #563 / 0.011% |
| 1917 | 116 / #543 / 0.013% |
| 1916 | 102 / #570 / 0.011% |
| 1915 | 124 / #500 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 98 / #496 / 0.015% |
| 1913 | 70 / #518 / 0.014% |
| 1912 | 68 / #480 / 0.016% |
| 1911 | 33 / #522 / 0.015% |
| 1910 | 22 / #633 / 0.011% |
| 1909 | 30 / #468 / 0.018% |
| 1908 | 19 / #608 / 0.012% |
| 1907 | 25 / #469 / 0.017% |
| 1906 | 15 / #636 / 0.011% |
| 1905 | 31 / #378 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 20 / #489 / 0.016% |
| 1903 | 18 / #518 / 0.015% |
| 1902 | 25 / #412 / 0.020% |
| 1901 | 19 / #449 / 0.018% |
| 1900 | 31 / #411 / 0.021% |
| 1899 | 14 / #543 / 0.013% |
| 1898 | 17 / #517 / 0.014% |
| 1897 | 22 / #407 / 0.020% |
| 1896 | 17 / #515 / 0.014% |
| 1895 | 16 / #522 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 19 / #459 / 0.016% |
| 1893 | 18 / #445 / 0.016% |
| 1892 | 20 / #440 / 0.016% |
| 1891 | 24 / #357 / 0.024% |
| 1890 | 18 / #431 / 0.016% |
| 1889 | 21 / #402 / 0.019% |
| 1888 | 10 / #687 / 0.008% |
| 1887 | 15 / #452 / 0.015% |
| 1886 | 23 / #366 / 0.021% |
| 1885 | 22 / #383 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 20 / #412 / 0.017% |
| 1883 | 17 / #445 / 0.016% |
| 1882 | 15 / #484 / 0.013% |
| 1881 | 11 / #557 / 0.011% |
| 1880 | 14 / #499 / 0.013% |