Total babies named Selma (all years): 27,141
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 61 / #2788 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 74 / #2436 / 0.005% |
| 2022 | 63 / #2747 / 0.004% |
| 2021 | 63 / #2745 / 0.004% |
| 2020 | 82 / #2213 / 0.005% |
| 2019 | 87 / #2151 / 0.005% |
| 2018 | 79 / #2325 / 0.005% |
| 2017 | 88 / #2178 / 0.005% |
| 2016 | 95 / #2081 / 0.005% |
| 2015 | 88 / #2165 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 109 / #1865 / 0.006% |
| 2013 | 82 / #2277 / 0.005% |
| 2012 | 72 / #2540 / 0.004% |
| 2011 | 96 / #2040 / 0.005% |
| 2010 | 86 / #2251 / 0.005% |
| 2009 | 87 / #2266 / 0.005% |
| 2008 | 90 / #2216 / 0.005% |
| 2007 | 100 / #2054 / 0.005% |
| 2006 | 103 / #1955 / 0.005% |
| 2005 | 117 / #1702 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 118 / #1653 / 0.006% |
| 2003 | 96 / #1911 / 0.005% |
| 2002 | 74 / #2248 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 90 / #1937 / 0.005% |
| 2000 | 81 / #2049 / 0.004% |
| 1999 | 70 / #2178 / 0.004% |
| 1998 | 64 / #2236 / 0.004% |
| 1997 | 54 / #2445 / 0.003% |
| 1996 | 42 / #2889 / 0.002% |
| 1995 | 32 / #3480 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 22 / #4661 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 17 / #5633 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 32 / #3480 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 30 / #3618 / 0.002% |
| 1990 | 35 / #3211 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 24 / #4102 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 26 / #3668 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 19 / #4440 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 27 / #3340 / 0.002% |
| 1985 | 11 / #6365 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 19 / #4137 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 19 / #4083 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 27 / #3238 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 28 / #3131 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 25 / #3395 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 19 / #4011 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 22 / #3483 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 26 / #3059 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 20 / #3505 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 22 / #3234 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 17 / #3828 / 0.001% |
| 1973 | 26 / #2731 / 0.002% |
| 1972 | 23 / #2962 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 37 / #2207 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 40 / #2073 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 35 / #2164 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 34 / #2083 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 40 / #1877 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 54 / #1527 / 0.003% |
| 1965 | 91 / #1107 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 63 / #1431 / 0.003% |
| 1963 | 66 / #1369 / 0.003% |
| 1962 | 89 / #1165 / 0.005% |
| 1961 | 116 / #1010 / 0.006% |
| 1960 | 93 / #1130 / 0.005% |
| 1959 | 91 / #1125 / 0.005% |
| 1958 | 90 / #1117 / 0.004% |
| 1957 | 105 / #1025 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 115 / #942 / 0.006% |
| 1955 | 113 / #927 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 104 / #951 / 0.005% |
| 1953 | 118 / #866 / 0.006% |
| 1952 | 102 / #919 / 0.006% |
| 1951 | 121 / #816 / 0.007% |
| 1950 | 102 / #883 / 0.006% |
| 1949 | 120 / #789 / 0.007% |
| 1948 | 129 / #752 / 0.008% |
| 1947 | 140 / #720 / 0.008% |
| 1946 | 138 / #679 / 0.009% |
| 1945 | 102 / #740 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 128 / #658 / 0.010% |
| 1943 | 122 / #688 / 0.009% |
| 1942 | 159 / #589 / 0.012% |
| 1941 | 144 / #583 / 0.012% |
| 1940 | 150 / #567 / 0.013% |
| 1939 | 156 / #534 / 0.014% |
| 1938 | 188 / #487 / 0.017% |
| 1937 | 225 / #438 / 0.021% |
| 1936 | 243 / #414 / 0.023% |
| 1935 | 212 / #444 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 264 / #401 / 0.025% |
| 1933 | 296 / #371 / 0.029% |
| 1932 | 326 / #354 / 0.031% |
| 1931 | 420 / #313 / 0.039% |
| 1930 | 550 / #273 / 0.049% |
| 1929 | 563 / #269 / 0.050% |
| 1928 | 598 / #264 / 0.052% |
| 1927 | 669 / #253 / 0.056% |
| 1926 | 671 / #254 / 0.057% |
| 1925 | 668 / #257 / 0.055% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 735 / #246 / 0.059% |
| 1923 | 703 / #245 / 0.058% |
| 1922 | 692 / #246 / 0.058% |
| 1921 | 704 / #251 / 0.057% |
| 1920 | 768 / #233 / 0.064% |
| 1919 | 682 / #244 / 0.060% |
| 1918 | 798 / #223 / 0.069% |
| 1917 | 786 / #216 / 0.073% |
| 1916 | 718 / #228 / 0.069% |
| 1915 | 741 / #217 / 0.075% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 587 / #214 / 0.077% |
| 1913 | 455 / #226 / 0.073% |
| 1912 | 387 / #230 / 0.069% |
| 1911 | 321 / #223 / 0.077% |
| 1910 | 293 / #221 / 0.074% |
| 1909 | 250 / #225 / 0.072% |
| 1908 | 257 / #210 / 0.077% |
| 1907 | 231 / #218 / 0.073% |
| 1906 | 252 / #193 / 0.085% |
| 1905 | 224 / #202 / 0.077% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 231 / #194 / 0.084% |
| 1903 | 218 / #194 / 0.083% |
| 1902 | 252 / #183 / 0.095% |
| 1901 | 242 / #181 / 0.101% |
| 1900 | 239 / #201 / 0.080% |
| 1899 | 206 / #193 / 0.088% |
| 1898 | 229 / #193 / 0.089% |
| 1897 | 183 / #205 / 0.078% |
| 1896 | 238 / #178 / 0.100% |
| 1895 | 208 / #188 / 0.089% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 212 / #183 / 0.095% |
| 1893 | 211 / #176 / 0.099% |
| 1892 | 209 / #175 / 0.098% |
| 1891 | 206 / #163 / 0.111% |
| 1890 | 165 / #183 / 0.087% |
| 1889 | 133 / #201 / 0.075% |
| 1888 | 139 / #190 / 0.078% |
| 1887 | 97 / #209 / 0.066% |
| 1886 | 91 / #209 / 0.063% |
| 1885 | 68 / #245 / 0.051% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 63 / #243 / 0.049% |
| 1883 | 80 / #189 / 0.071% |
| 1882 | 54 / #237 / 0.050% |
| 1881 | 47 / #230 / 0.051% |
| 1880 | 36 / #259 / 0.040% |