Total babies named Sue (all years): 145,042
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 13 / #8338 / 0.001% |
| 2023 | 9 / #11055 / 0.001% |
| 2022 | 5 / #17449 / 0.000% |
| 2021 | 5 / #17390 / 0.000% |
| 2019 | 6 / #15337 / 0.000% |
| 2018 | 16 / #7374 / 0.001% |
| 2017 | 10 / #10606 / 0.001% |
| 2016 | 12 / #9360 / 0.001% |
| 2015 | 13 / #8884 / 0.001% |
| 2014 | 15 / #8010 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2013 | 26 / #5301 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 13 / #9055 / 0.001% |
| 2011 | 19 / #6818 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 17 / #7475 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 25 / #5690 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 17 / #7705 / 0.001% |
| 2007 | 23 / #6058 / 0.001% |
| 2006 | 22 / #6102 / 0.001% |
| 2005 | 21 / #5974 / 0.001% |
| 2004 | 14 / #8197 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2003 | 23 / #5394 / 0.001% |
| 2002 | 25 / #4886 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 32 / #4020 / 0.002% |
| 2000 | 36 / #3652 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 29 / #4071 / 0.002% |
| 1998 | 32 / #3724 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 43 / #2868 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 38 / #3138 / 0.002% |
| 1995 | 47 / #2649 / 0.003% |
| 1994 | 48 / #2621 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1993 | 64 / #2122 / 0.004% |
| 1992 | 68 / #2028 / 0.004% |
| 1991 | 79 / #1814 / 0.004% |
| 1990 | 74 / #1903 / 0.004% |
| 1989 | 86 / #1627 / 0.005% |
| 1988 | 97 / #1438 / 0.005% |
| 1987 | 101 / #1361 / 0.006% |
| 1986 | 108 / #1258 / 0.006% |
| 1985 | 140 / #1059 / 0.008% |
| 1984 | 147 / #987 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1983 | 171 / #889 / 0.010% |
| 1982 | 211 / #779 / 0.012% |
| 1981 | 270 / #658 / 0.016% |
| 1980 | 346 / #544 / 0.021% |
| 1979 | 272 / #642 / 0.017% |
| 1978 | 235 / #682 / 0.015% |
| 1977 | 280 / #606 / 0.018% |
| 1976 | 241 / #646 / 0.016% |
| 1975 | 293 / #567 / 0.020% |
| 1974 | 355 / #496 / 0.024% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1973 | 396 / #463 / 0.027% |
| 1972 | 452 / #431 / 0.030% |
| 1971 | 632 / #372 / 0.038% |
| 1970 | 665 / #367 / 0.038% |
| 1969 | 811 / #318 / 0.048% |
| 1968 | 979 / #276 / 0.060% |
| 1967 | 1,258 / #232 / 0.076% |
| 1966 | 1,316 / #228 / 0.078% |
| 1965 | 1,775 / #190 / 0.101% |
| 1964 | 2,173 / #176 / 0.115% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1963 | 2,591 / #155 / 0.134% |
| 1962 | 3,184 / #135 / 0.162% |
| 1961 | 3,506 / #130 / 0.174% |
| 1960 | 4,009 / #120 / 0.198% |
| 1959 | 4,387 / #107 / 0.217% |
| 1958 | 4,673 / #102 / 0.232% |
| 1957 | 4,490 / #104 / 0.220% |
| 1956 | 3,756 / #118 / 0.187% |
| 1955 | 3,728 / #116 / 0.191% |
| 1954 | 3,975 / #106 / 0.205% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1953 | 3,648 / #106 / 0.194% |
| 1952 | 3,335 / #113 / 0.180% |
| 1951 | 3,357 / #106 / 0.186% |
| 1950 | 3,503 / #100 / 0.204% |
| 1949 | 3,926 / #88 / 0.229% |
| 1948 | 4,674 / #78 / 0.275% |
| 1947 | 5,306 / #69 / 0.299% |
| 1946 | 5,144 / #61 / 0.327% |
| 1945 | 3,915 / #66 / 0.300% |
| 1944 | 4,034 / #62 / 0.304% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1943 | 3,850 / #72 / 0.276% |
| 1942 | 3,630 / #73 / 0.269% |
| 1941 | 3,358 / #75 / 0.278% |
| 1940 | 3,106 / #81 / 0.272% |
| 1939 | 2,623 / #92 / 0.239% |
| 1938 | 2,589 / #104 / 0.235% |
| 1937 | 2,504 / #101 / 0.235% |
| 1936 | 2,222 / #109 / 0.214% |
| 1935 | 2,024 / #115 / 0.193% |
| 1934 | 1,933 / #119 / 0.185% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1933 | 1,670 / #131 / 0.166% |
| 1932 | 1,509 / #139 / 0.141% |
| 1931 | 1,220 / #153 / 0.115% |
| 1930 | 1,213 / #167 / 0.108% |
| 1929 | 944 / #198 / 0.085% |
| 1928 | 780 / #225 / 0.068% |
| 1927 | 678 / #251 / 0.057% |
| 1926 | 697 / #248 / 0.059% |
| 1925 | 673 / #255 / 0.055% |
| 1924 | 644 / #258 / 0.052% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1923 | 598 / #262 / 0.050% |
| 1922 | 684 / #252 / 0.057% |
| 1921 | 668 / #256 / 0.054% |
| 1920 | 707 / #246 / 0.059% |
| 1919 | 693 / #242 / 0.061% |
| 1918 | 785 / #226 / 0.068% |
| 1917 | 778 / #218 / 0.072% |
| 1916 | 868 / #203 / 0.083% |
| 1915 | 812 / #203 / 0.083% |
| 1914 | 634 / #205 / 0.083% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1913 | 483 / #215 / 0.077% |
| 1912 | 431 / #215 / 0.077% |
| 1911 | 330 / #214 / 0.079% |
| 1910 | 277 / #231 / 0.070% |
| 1909 | 243 / #231 / 0.070% |
| 1908 | 206 / #237 / 0.062% |
| 1907 | 201 / #233 / 0.063% |
| 1906 | 178 / #243 / 0.060% |
| 1905 | 191 / #225 / 0.066% |
| 1904 | 163 / #245 / 0.059% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1903 | 146 / #252 / 0.056% |
| 1902 | 154 / #251 / 0.058% |
| 1901 | 135 / #250 / 0.056% |
| 1900 | 157 / #261 / 0.052% |
| 1899 | 122 / #259 / 0.052% |
| 1898 | 143 / #250 / 0.055% |
| 1897 | 145 / #229 / 0.062% |
| 1896 | 121 / #261 / 0.051% |
| 1895 | 157 / #219 / 0.067% |
| 1894 | 105 / #270 / 0.047% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1893 | 123 / #237 / 0.058% |
| 1892 | 163 / #197 / 0.077% |
| 1891 | 127 / #210 / 0.068% |
| 1890 | 120 / #223 / 0.063% |
| 1889 | 112 / #220 / 0.063% |
| 1888 | 117 / #212 / 0.066% |
| 1887 | 123 / #182 / 0.084% |
| 1886 | 96 / #203 / 0.066% |
| 1885 | 94 / #195 / 0.071% |
| 1884 | 92 / #195 / 0.071% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 68 / #217 / 0.061% |
| 1882 | 84 / #172 / 0.078% |
| 1881 | 67 / #186 / 0.073% |
| 1880 | 65 / #190 / 0.071% |