Total babies named Tommy (all years): 181,214
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 358 / #731 / 0.021% |
| 2023 | 387 / #690 / 0.023% |
| 2022 | 357 / #727 / 0.020% |
| 2021 | 351 / #734 / 0.020% |
| 2020 | 326 / #745 / 0.019% |
| 2019 | 361 / #698 / 0.020% |
| 2018 | 331 / #724 / 0.018% |
| 2017 | 345 / #710 / 0.019% |
| 2016 | 321 / #759 / 0.017% |
| 2015 | 356 / #706 / 0.019% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 333 / #724 / 0.017% |
| 2013 | 368 / #658 / 0.019% |
| 2012 | 388 / #627 / 0.020% |
| 2011 | 368 / #637 / 0.019% |
| 2010 | 420 / #595 / 0.022% |
| 2009 | 470 / #564 / 0.024% |
| 2008 | 525 / #518 / 0.026% |
| 2007 | 543 / #489 / 0.026% |
| 2006 | 586 / #462 / 0.029% |
| 2005 | 626 / #426 / 0.031% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 686 / #394 / 0.035% |
| 2003 | 670 / #390 / 0.034% |
| 2002 | 801 / #343 / 0.041% |
| 2001 | 842 / #331 / 0.043% |
| 2000 | 959 / #307 / 0.049% |
| 1999 | 959 / #299 / 0.050% |
| 1998 | 951 / #299 / 0.050% |
| 1997 | 995 / #281 / 0.053% |
| 1996 | 862 / #308 / 0.046% |
| 1995 | 852 / #311 / 0.045% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 831 / #316 / 0.043% |
| 1993 | 820 / #322 / 0.042% |
| 1992 | 884 / #302 / 0.044% |
| 1991 | 903 / #289 / 0.045% |
| 1990 | 981 / #270 / 0.048% |
| 1989 | 958 / #263 / 0.048% |
| 1988 | 946 / #250 / 0.049% |
| 1987 | 987 / #239 / 0.053% |
| 1986 | 965 / #239 / 0.052% |
| 1985 | 981 / #237 / 0.053% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 975 / #230 / 0.054% |
| 1983 | 1,007 / #224 / 0.056% |
| 1982 | 1,171 / #210 / 0.065% |
| 1981 | 1,213 / #205 / 0.068% |
| 1980 | 1,259 / #197 / 0.071% |
| 1979 | 1,279 / #187 / 0.074% |
| 1978 | 1,321 / #177 / 0.080% |
| 1977 | 1,332 / #177 / 0.081% |
| 1976 | 1,393 / #170 / 0.089% |
| 1975 | 1,554 / #156 / 0.100% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,579 / #155 / 0.100% |
| 1973 | 1,731 / #143 / 0.111% |
| 1972 | 1,773 / #146 / 0.109% |
| 1971 | 1,994 / #148 / 0.113% |
| 1970 | 2,220 / #148 / 0.119% |
| 1969 | 2,249 / #134 / 0.126% |
| 1968 | 2,369 / #125 / 0.136% |
| 1967 | 2,355 / #127 / 0.135% |
| 1966 | 2,467 / #124 / 0.138% |
| 1965 | 2,718 / #119 / 0.146% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 3,205 / #108 / 0.161% |
| 1963 | 3,499 / #107 / 0.172% |
| 1962 | 3,416 / #109 / 0.165% |
| 1961 | 3,404 / #116 / 0.160% |
| 1960 | 3,684 / #112 / 0.173% |
| 1959 | 3,771 / #108 / 0.177% |
| 1958 | 3,832 / #104 / 0.181% |
| 1957 | 3,679 / #102 / 0.171% |
| 1956 | 3,109 / #115 / 0.147% |
| 1955 | 3,177 / #108 / 0.154% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 3,407 / #100 / 0.167% |
| 1953 | 3,469 / #95 / 0.176% |
| 1952 | 3,512 / #97 / 0.181% |
| 1951 | 3,582 / #94 / 0.190% |
| 1950 | 3,434 / #94 / 0.192% |
| 1949 | 3,886 / #84 / 0.219% |
| 1948 | 4,220 / #79 / 0.241% |
| 1947 | 4,594 / #79 / 0.251% |
| 1946 | 4,144 / #77 / 0.255% |
| 1945 | 3,448 / #76 / 0.256% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 3,696 / #70 / 0.271% |
| 1943 | 3,612 / #77 / 0.253% |
| 1942 | 3,531 / #73 / 0.256% |
| 1941 | 3,087 / #71 / 0.251% |
| 1940 | 2,827 / #76 / 0.244% |
| 1939 | 2,622 / #77 / 0.237% |
| 1938 | 2,667 / #77 / 0.240% |
| 1937 | 2,327 / #84 / 0.218% |
| 1936 | 2,107 / #91 / 0.203% |
| 1935 | 2,031 / #95 / 0.195% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 1,938 / #98 / 0.188% |
| 1933 | 1,630 / #109 / 0.164% |
| 1932 | 1,613 / #109 / 0.154% |
| 1931 | 1,536 / #115 / 0.148% |
| 1930 | 1,386 / #127 / 0.126% |
| 1929 | 1,164 / #144 / 0.108% |
| 1928 | 1,062 / #151 / 0.096% |
| 1927 | 878 / #170 / 0.078% |
| 1926 | 751 / #192 / 0.068% |
| 1925 | 705 / #201 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 568 / #240 / 0.050% |
| 1923 | 479 / #255 / 0.044% |
| 1922 | 498 / #252 / 0.046% |
| 1921 | 400 / #277 / 0.036% |
| 1920 | 344 / #309 / 0.032% |
| 1919 | 298 / #325 / 0.030% |
| 1918 | 297 / #332 / 0.029% |
| 1917 | 262 / #342 / 0.028% |
| 1916 | 210 / #382 / 0.024% |
| 1915 | 193 / #388 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 181 / #347 / 0.028% |
| 1913 | 120 / #389 / 0.023% |
| 1912 | 91 / #407 / 0.021% |
| 1911 | 71 / #322 / 0.031% |
| 1910 | 82 / #274 / 0.042% |
| 1909 | 59 / #298 / 0.036% |
| 1908 | 57 / #289 / 0.037% |
| 1907 | 44 / #323 / 0.030% |
| 1906 | 28 / #421 / 0.021% |
| 1905 | 37 / #335 / 0.028% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 32 / #358 / 0.025% |
| 1903 | 44 / #289 / 0.037% |
| 1902 | 32 / #354 / 0.026% |
| 1901 | 31 / #324 / 0.029% |
| 1900 | 42 / #336 / 0.028% |
| 1899 | 21 / #414 / 0.020% |
| 1898 | 18 / #503 / 0.015% |
| 1897 | 15 / #550 / 0.013% |
| 1896 | 17 / #517 / 0.014% |
| 1895 | 20 / #453 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 14 / #565 / 0.012% |
| 1893 | 16 / #478 / 0.014% |
| 1892 | 16 / #520 / 0.013% |
| 1891 | 8 / #762 / 0.008% |
| 1890 | 14 / #532 / 0.013% |
| 1889 | 9 / #719 / 0.008% |
| 1888 | 10 / #698 / 0.008% |
| 1887 | 18 / #408 / 0.018% |
| 1886 | 13 / #536 / 0.012% |
| 1885 | 7 / #829 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 6 / #963 / 0.005% |
| 1883 | 11 / #592 / 0.011% |
| 1882 | 7 / #830 / 0.006% |
| 1881 | 8 / #699 / 0.008% |
| 1880 | 5 / #1048 / 0.005% |